2007 or 2009?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 12-05-2008, 09:09 PM
09KLXowner's Avatar
Banned
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,078
Default

sorry, I'd rip into mine if it weren't for the fact that it is in the single digits and snow is forecasted. lol
 
  #32  
Old 12-05-2008, 09:23 PM
deej's Avatar
Your Humble Moderator/Admin
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 21,060
Default

07 or 09? What about 06?
 
  #33  
Old 12-05-2008, 11:33 PM
WestOzKLX's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia.
Posts: 3,229
Default

C'mon Deej, ya know the 07 is the best model, although mudflaps bring the 06 close.
 
  #34  
Old 12-07-2008, 07:53 AM
09KLXowner's Avatar
Banned
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,078
Default

Originally Posted by WestOzKLX
Quote: Speedyjim.
"stock fork spring is 416 mm free length, 38mm OD (very odd length - short). Stock dogbones lower rear by using a 119.5 mm link.

You can get back your pre 09 suspension travel by installing 117 mm dogbones off earlier model at rear and remove spacers in cartridge of forks and use the 460 mm springs. Obviously your seat height will rise."
Probably makes more sense now.
look at the picture of this pre-production 2009 KLX250S- if you look on the dogbone (rear shock linkage) you'll see the number 117. What's up with that if the real bike had a longer link? I will check mine when it warms up but looking at this picture, it looks as if the bike has more travel than the bike I have and everyone else has. Anyone want to sell some '06/'07 rear shock links that you've removed to lower the bike?

http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/photo...i-KLX250Sd.jpg
 
  #35  
Old 12-07-2008, 08:18 AM
tremor38's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Misawa Japan
Posts: 3,106
Default

Originally Posted by 09KLXowner
bear: LMAO. Just because something has more suspension travel, as I told you "months ago", doesn't mean it will perform better off-road. Read any review of the '09 and they praised the suspension for what it and the bike was built for. To be totally honest, I'm 100% happy with the '09's performance and haven't hit anything on it that I didn't hit on my '06. And, my '06 would bottom so much easier than the '09 does. In fact, I've only bottomed the '09 once and that was right after I got it and hadn't adjusted the front forks. Since, it never has. The '09 may not look as rugged in stock trim as the '06/'07, but when you look at the technical details regarding the updates to wheels, spokes, swingarm, larger rear brake, larger radiators, stronger shift star, etc., it is setup better for off-road. And to continue being honest, the only reason I would like to embark on this little escapade of raising the suspension is because of how my red '09 will look. Plus, it will perform that much better when pushed if required.
Just get out of prison or what?

Another rare occasion where we agree. The 09, by all review I've read so far is MORE dirt worthty the 06/07. That's spead across at leat six magazine reviews that I know of and all of the review agree on that point.

Dirt worthiness is not measured by suspension travel alone. In fact, Ricky Carmichael preferred his suspension travel to be less than what the 09 has. It's all in how you setup rest of the geometry and your spring rates.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
QuiteThumper
KLX 250S
4
12-14-2010 08:09 PM
ns503
KLX 250S
0
06-21-2010 03:07 PM
Sail-A-Wai
KLX 250S
6
11-07-2008 06:07 AM
fixxxr
KLX 250S
26
03-21-2008 09:05 PM
bushrider
KLX 250S
5
01-14-2008 11:26 AM



Quick Reply: 2007 or 2009?????



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:33 AM.