KLX250 2007 vs. 2009

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-12-2008, 09:27 PM
bushrider's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 21
Default KLX250 2007 vs. 2009

I sure am glad I got the 2007 model. Stronger spokes and better brakes are always welcome, but otherwise the 2009 model looks like a step backwards. I ride my KLX as a dirt bike first and in that regard it looks like Kawasaki is heading the wrong direction.

I noticed the weight of the bike has increased nearly 20 pounds:

2009 Dry weight: 277.8 lbs.(280 lbs CA model)

Ouch.. this is compared to 262 lbs for the 06/07.. lighter weight makes a big difference on steep difficult trails.

If I were buying a new bike today, I would be taking a good look at the 2008 Husqvarna TE 250.. too bad since I really like Kawasaki. (my KLX has been 100% reliable and nearly indestructible so far!)

 
  #2  
Old 01-12-2008, 09:49 PM
lcpl0331's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The RIGHT coast
Posts: 1,534
Default RE: KLX250 2007 vs. 2009

they ARE trying to make it more of a street bike. they didn't make a newmodelfor the guys/girls who already have one.they're not trying to get us to upgrade. they want people who don't have a bike to buy them.
 
  #3  
Old 01-12-2008, 10:29 PM
vlodpg's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fairfield Cnty CT
Posts: 319
Default RE: KLX250 2007 vs. 2009

A bit more weight on the road will help it be more stable! I won't pass judgment tillI see them.
 
  #4  
Old 01-12-2008, 11:20 PM
Nobrakes's Avatar
Admin
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,269
Default RE: KLX250 2007 vs. 2009

Talk about weight, I rode a DR650 today. Man that thing has some bulk. It rode like a cadillac. I'm used to my KTM EXC with the stiff suspension and hard seat. The DR felt like a minivan by comparison, couldn't hardly feel the bumps at all. It was fun, though - different. Definitely more comfortable on the road, but I wouldn't want to do much with it in the woods.
 
  #5  
Old 01-13-2008, 07:19 PM
FM_Thumper's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 910
Default RE: KLX250 2007 vs. 2009


ORIGINAL: Nobrakes

Talk about weight, I rode a DR650 today. Man that thing has some bulk. It rode like a cadillac. I'm used to my KTM EXC with the stiff suspension and hard seat. The DR felt like a minivan by comparison, couldn't hardly feel the bumps at all. It was fun, though - different. Definitely more comfortable on the road, but I wouldn't want to do much with it in the woods.
I always wanted one of those. A nice street bike with occasional unpaved trail roads thrown in. A KLR650 with a little more dirt capability.
 
  #6  
Old 01-14-2008, 11:26 AM
mustang's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kersey, PA
Posts: 463
Default RE: KLX250 2007 vs. 2009

ORIGINAL: Nobrakes

Talk about weight, I rode a DR650 today. Man that thing has some bulk. It rode like a cadillac. I'm used to my KTM EXC with the stiff suspension and hard seat. The DR felt like a minivan by comparison, couldn't hardly feel the bumps at all. It was fun, though - different. Definitely more comfortable on the road, but I wouldn't want to do much with it in the woods.
Now you know why I also have my KLX250. The DR is a great commuter bike - handleswell on-road, plenty of power and torque, and rides really nice. Off-road, it's a handful. Even with the proper tires, it's way too heavy and suspended way too soft. With all of its weight and power, on tight trails, you don't steer it - you correct it. Fireroads and two-tracks are a blast though.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BigGreenBastard
KLX 250S
12
02-18-2011 06:02 PM
Hickey
KLX 250S
16
07-09-2009 01:26 PM
Sideways1
KLX 250S
11
02-26-2009 02:32 PM
buffalony
KLX 250S
9
08-29-2008 07:12 PM
MaverickAus
KLX 250S
4
12-06-2007 06:14 PM



Quick Reply: KLX250 2007 vs. 2009



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 AM.