stopped at the dealer today and sat on a...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 04:18 AM
  #11  
ol'klx-er's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,800
From: kootenay country BC Canada
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by Lotrat
That could change if they bring their 2012 CRF250L to the US.
Soon to be at Canadian Honda dealerships!!

Same engine as the CBR250.
 
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 04:22 AM
  #12  
2007 Green Machine's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 349
From: Fort Atkinson, WI
Default

Originally Posted by ol'klx-er
Soon to be at Canadian Honda dealerships!!

Same engine as the CBR250.
And 22HP. ( U.K. web site ) Looks like a nice bike.

Why does everyone else get stuff that we don't. EPA?
 
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 05:42 AM
  #13  
TNC's Avatar
TNC
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,050
From: Abilene, TX
1st Gear Member
Default

They've also had another water-cooled XR250 type in the international market that we've never seen here.
 
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 03:25 PM
  #14  
Lotrat's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 653
From: Vista, CA
1st Gear Member
Default

......................CRF250L...KLX250S
BorexStroke....76x56......72x61.2
Fuel System......FI...........Carb
Seat Height......34.7"......35"
Gears................6............6
Forks.................43mm....43mm
Travel................10"........10"
Curb Wt...........324 lbs....298 lbs
Fuel..................2 Gal.......2 Gal
Fuel Gauge.......Yes.........No

If they were priced the same, which would you buy? That motor better be smooth to make up for the 25lbs of extra weight.
 

Last edited by Lotrat; Apr 12, 2012 at 03:28 PM.
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 03:54 PM
  #15  
Pogiboy's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 389
Default

Originally Posted by Lotrat
......................CRF250L...KLX250S
BorexStroke....76x56......72x61.2
Fuel System......FI...........Carb
Seat Height......34.7"......35"
Gears................6............6
Forks.................43mm....43mm
Travel................10"........10"
Curb Wt...........324 lbs....298 lbs
Fuel..................2 Gal.......2 Gal
Fuel Gauge.......Yes.........No

If they were priced the same, which would you buy? That motor better be smooth to make up for the 25lbs of extra weight.
Klx with the 351 would be the winner for me at least. Still way cheaper , lighter . Even performance wise.
My guess that honda would cost almost twice as much too. Lol.
 
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 04:34 PM
  #16  
jhoffy22's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 592
1st Gear Member
Default

& you would almost undoubtedly have valve problems at low mileage with the honda. Either way, the klx 250 with the 351 big bore makes it a bike of its own. nothing comes close to the curb weight/power ratio in dual sports. The bigger bikes might like the 650s but who cares about the curb weight because they are too heavy to do any real trail riding anyways.
 
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 04:35 PM
  #17  
jeffzx9's Avatar
Super Moderator
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,350
From: Clarksville, OH
Default

Funny how different brands evoke different feelings (at least for me.) Much depends on your experience with a very small sample. Some vehicles that I love, other guys curse, and vice-versa. I've also learned to judge "vehicle-specifically" and by model year(s). Makes me wonder about the internal dynamics and politics of companies when (as TNC^ relates above) they completely MISS the obvious, and/or experiment with designs and models. .....those moments we all have where we say "OMG, what were they thinking here???"
Huskies? I know what they WERE back in the late 70's/early 80's. Doesn't mean I know anything about them NOW.
 
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 05:53 PM
  #18  
ahnh666's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,135
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

basically similar to a jetted klx250 in terms of power....just all high-tech....

Honda CBR250R Engine: 249.5 cc (15.23 cu in) single cylinder four-stroke, 4 valves, liquid cooled, counterbalanced, PGM-FI
Bore/Stroke: 76.0 × 55.0 mm (2.99 × 2.17 in)
Compression ratio: 10.7:1
Top speed: 87 mph (140 km/h) & 91.2 mph (146.8 km/h)
Power: 23.7 hp (17.7 kW) @ 9,900 rpm & 21.9 hp (16.3 kW) @ 8,500 rpm
Torque: 12.7 lb·ft (17.2 N·m) @ 7,400 rpm & 14.65 lb·ft (19.86 N·m) @ 6,750 rpm
Ignition type: CDI
 
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 08:20 PM
  #19  
deej's Avatar
Your Humble Moderator/Admin
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 21,060
From: Washington
1st Gear Member
Default

Honda ROCKS!!!!!!! shhhhh wait who said that?
 
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 08:33 PM
  #20  
jeffzx9's Avatar
Super Moderator
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,350
From: Clarksville, OH
Default

(Personally, I think their charging systems are historically weak; something about their circuitry is wonky. Engines are pretty bulletproof, though.)
 



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:08 AM.