put my SF on the dyno.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 05:50 PM
  #1  
sw0ggd0gg's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 175
From: Dayton Ohio
Default put my SF on the dyno.

I have a 340 kit, Two bros Fully exhaust, dynojet kit, snork out. Runnign 128 main and needle second clip. 1.75-2 turns on a/f screw.

28.3 WHP and 21 Ft lb. not bad for the little bike.

My afr was a little rich like 12.9-13.5 WOT but its definitely acceptable. Especially when its 90 degrees out. Itll be safer for winter months.

My cruising afr under 5k was acceptable like 13.5-14

After 5k the ignition switches to more advanced curve so it ran a little leaner until half throttle which was normal.

 

Last edited by sw0ggd0gg; Jul 16, 2010 at 02:40 PM.
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 07:40 PM
  #2  
zomby woof's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 869
From: SW Ontario, Canada
1st Gear Member
Default

A touch lean, but almost perfect at WOT. Under 12.5 would be a little rich. Ideal is roughly 12.8-13.2, and you're right there.
 
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 08:11 PM
  #3  
work's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 150
Default

what kind of dyno was this on? and whats your elevation? those are pretty impressive numbers.
 
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 10:34 PM
  #4  
wild will's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 165
Default

Do you have any dyno sheets?

I would be interested to see what rpm your motor makes max HP and torque at?

Here are a few of my sheets from my dyno run. I have a BB351cc, web 101 cam, ported & polished, FMF powerbomb, 2Bro silencer, BB34mm carb, and kdx snorkle.

Name:  billsbestrun.jpg
Views: 195
Size:  68.1 KB

Name:  bill351klx.jpg
Views: 310
Size:  59.4 KB

Name:  bills351.jpg
Views: 108
Size:  68.1 KB
 
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 11:09 PM
  #5  
FlyingFinn's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 231
Default

One of these days I want to see dyno runs of one same motor with
- no airbox lid
- lid on, no snorkel
- KDX snorkel
- stock snorkel

--
Mikko
 
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 11:46 PM
  #6  
Finger Mullet's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,332
Default

Nice Will, a solid 33 hp, that head work was worth it. especially considering it started at 18 hp or so.

Hey, d0gg .... post up your dyno if you can.
 
Old Jul 16, 2010 | 01:00 AM
  #7  
buffalony's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 270
Default

You do know that Stochiometric efficiency of a combustion engine is 14.7:1

Anything less than 14.7:1 is rich, anything more than that is lean

Dont believe me, call me a liar then read it for yourself

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air-fuel_ratio
 
Old Jul 16, 2010 | 01:27 AM
  #8  
zomby woof's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 869
From: SW Ontario, Canada
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by buffalony
You do know that Stochiometric efficiency of a combustion engine is 14.7:1

Anything less than 14.7:1 is rich, anything more than that is lean

Dont believe me, call me a liar then read it for yourself

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air-fuel_ratio
Another expert.
You can run your bike at 14.7, but I won't.

Do a search for best power air fuel ratio. Let me know what you find.

Looking at those numbers again, he's so close to perfect at WOT, I wouldn't touch the main.
 
Old Jul 16, 2010 | 02:08 AM
  #9  
buffalony's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 270
Default

I agree with what he is saying. 12's are rich... 13.5-14 is about as perfect as your going to get with the additives in the pump gas in the US.
 
Old Jul 16, 2010 | 11:02 AM
  #10  
zomby woof's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 869
From: SW Ontario, Canada
1st Gear Member
Default

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
 



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20 AM.