Lowering links (a little info)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 05-30-2010, 10:41 PM
RaceGass's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,352
Default

My height challenged wife didn't want to use lowering links, we talked over cutting down the corners of the seat to help her touch more than her tippy toes. Using 1 1/8" bar adapters & bars allow the forks to be raised up in the triple clamps 1.5" + setting rear sag to max allowed the wife to learn on it. Raising it back up since she is learning more & more.

Lowering links only index the swingarm in a different spot which = less travel till your tire rubs the fender. 117 mm links raise the suspension, 119.5 mm = stock 09.
 
  #22  
Old 05-31-2010, 01:51 AM
zomby woof's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW Ontario, Canada
Posts: 869
Default

Lowering links change the moment (leverage, or linkage ratio), which does two things, increase wheel travel, and soften the wheel rate. Being 155 lbs, the reduced wheel rate is better. I ended up a little lower than stock, with no bottoming on the fender, more travel, and softer suspension.
it's a win win situation for me.
 
  #23  
Old 08-09-2010, 04:20 AM
FlyingFinn's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 231
Default Rising Links this time

The PO of my KLX has got the front springs replaced, I don't know what rate they are but they are plenty stiff for me. With 35mm of static sag I have only ~90mm of race sag with my ~190 lbs sitting on the bike.

But the rear spring is stock and was clearly "out of balance" with the front.
The rear sags more than front when load is added on the bike, ideally front and rear moves by the same amount when bike is loaded (with the rider).

My initial rear numbers were:
Static sag = 40mm
Race sag = 125mm (remember, front RS is only ~ 90mm. very unbalanced)

I first added some preload to reduce the sag, then I had:
Static sag = 28mm
Race sag = 110

That was better but still it was clear that spring rates front vs. rear were quite unbalanced.
Instead of ordering a new rear spring, I decided to first try poor man's way to effectively rise the spring rate by using shorter dog bones.
I bought a set of KDX "bones" from Ebay, got them for $20 shipped. Way less than a new spring.

With the shorter bones I was expecting higher ride height and effectively stiffer spring.
I got that, but seems the shorter bones also change the progressiveness of the spring. It's softer in the beginning but gets progressively stiffer later.

Without touching the preload, my new sag numbers are:
Static = 40mm
Race = 110mm

So when my 190 lbs sits on the bike, with KLX bones it sinks an additional 82mm, but with the KDX bones it sinks 70mm.
But yet the static sag increased from 28mm to 40mm.

Kind of interesting.

And I can really tell the difference in effective rear spring rate.
Before the rear always saged more when bouncing the bike, now both ends sag more or less the same when bike is pressed down at the seat (where rider's weight is).

I'd consider this a very successful way to beef up the rear spring rate for someone who's little too heavy for the stock suspension and won't mind the small increase in seat height.

The fully extended ride height of the rear increased by 20mm.

--
Mikko
 
  #24  
Old 08-08-2011, 04:43 PM
adladuk's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1
Default Klx 650

Hi, anyone know how much to increase the centre's on a stock KLX 650? Want to lower the bike about 1.5 inches. Links are stamped at 124mm centres. Thanks Ad
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kdick91
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade Classifieds
3
06-25-2014 09:00 PM
motodad
KX65
1
04-16-2007 09:56 PM
KAWASAKIspeed
KLX 250S
31
05-10-2006 08:21 PM
kotacam
General Tech
8
10-02-2005 08:56 PM
cyclops
General Tech
1
05-23-2005 07:54 AM



Quick Reply: Lowering links (a little info)



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:57 AM.