KLX 250 ( 300 ) camshaft mod by Marcelino

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2016 | 04:36 AM
  #951  
peabrain's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 269
1st Gear Member
Default

Holstebro Denmark
 
Old Jun 16, 2016 | 04:56 AM
  #952  
peabrain's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 269
1st Gear Member
Default

is running without snorkel and MCM safe on EFI or should i get a power commander first?
 
Old Jun 16, 2016 | 10:51 AM
  #953  
Josh128's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 125
1st Gear Member
Default

MCM should not affect your current setup as it neither increases displacement nor RPM nor duration of intake stroke. Like the Nike ads say, "Just Do It".
 
Old Jul 2, 2016 | 02:12 PM
  #954  
Matt88-8's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 82
From: Ontario, Canada
1st Gear Member
Default

Wow. This thread got way off track
 
Old Jul 3, 2016 | 11:50 AM
  #955  
klx678's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,650
From: Delaware, Ohio
1st Gear Member
Default

Discussions on interesting subjects can lead off track numerous times in areas that may relate originally. Part of what makes a good discussion is trailing off a bit then cycling back.
 
Old Jul 7, 2016 | 01:22 AM
  #956  
RimBender's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 618
From: WA state
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by Josh128
Well, I guess I lied about posting again in this thread, but I just found a KLR 250 manual online, which I said I'd look for earlier. This is the bike that shares its engine with the Mojave and is essentially the technological predecessor to the KLX 250/300 engine. It shares so many similarities (except the valve timing!!) with the KLX I feel this info is relevant to those looking to understand what the MCM does. Note the super advanced intake valve timing of 41 deg BTDC on the first model, and the Mojave matching 31 deg on the later models.

Also of note is the incredible horsepower claim (this HAS to be at the crank ).

So again, these KLR, KSF, KFX engines share similar bore, stroke, #of valves, compression, and liquid cooling with the KLX, while the valve timing and rocker arms between cams and valves are the biggest differences.


The cam timings listed by the manufacture are at zero lift, and the stock cam profiles favor a slow ramps for durability of the valve train. To really understand the timings you need to see the timing at 1mm lift. When you check that out ( I did) you'll find this cam mod has the motor running with zero overlap, not conductive to performance. The cams just aren't ground with enough duration to make the change in lobe separation work. Any felt gain would be from the earlier intake closing time which results in more dynamic compression. At expense of killing its ability to breathe at high rpms. Maybe more of a concern with the carb'd bike than the rpm limited efi euro bikes. my 02, I couldn't put it back fast enough.
 
Old Jul 7, 2016 | 04:49 AM
  #957  
Klxster's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,315
From: North Texas
1st Gear Member
Default

Concerning overlap: The exhaust valve stays open past the standard close point(retarded), and the intake opens/unseats earlier (advanced) with MCM. So at the top of the exhaust stroke/beginning of the intake stroke, overlap in increased. (This is the aspect of the MCM that gives a "power boost" on top..)

Whatever the stock overlap measures, the MCM increases it. How could it not? Whether your measuring @ .050 or not, you are opening the intake valve earlier and closing the exhaust valve later - increasing the amount of time both are unseated (overlap) around TDC on the intake stroke..

Visually, the MCM rotates/repositions the cams toward each other.. Now if, somehow, a MCM was done backward - repositioning/rotating the cams away from each other - you certainly would loose overlap with, no doubt, lousy performance.
 

Last edited by Klxster; Jul 7, 2016 at 08:02 AM.
Old Jul 8, 2016 | 09:28 PM
  #958  
RimBender's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 618
From: WA state
1st Gear Member
Default

thanks I may have mathematically calculated the OL wrong for the mod. I did however have them positioned correct. The 1st time I did the int cam only, 2nd time both. FWIW the stock .050" spec is. intake 2.5/37.5, exh 37/5, zero OL, duration 215/212 measured by webcam. The intake closing time is the most important timing event. Stock it is about where it should be. Modded it moves too far, closing to soon for good fill. That's exactly how it runs too, despite any increase in OL. The increase in dynamic compression from the early closing gives it some more felt power down low, but in my case takes away the strong pull at redline on top. This was more noticeable when I put it all back stock. Where I did think it helped was in slow trails, maybe using a gear higher roll on. just my 02, has been a few years since messing with it.

my bike is a 06 250, here's what it looked like new, rejetted with a kdx snorkle and 300 exh system. Sort of my baseline as I played with K&N filter, lid off, big gun pipe, cam phasing, offset timing key later.

KLX 250 ( 300 ) camshaft mod by Marcelino-klx-dyno-128-001.jpg
 
Old Jul 8, 2016 | 11:46 PM
  #959  
Klxster's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,315
From: North Texas
1st Gear Member
Default

You should know that, best I can tell from a few years of researching performance modded non-MCM KLX's, they seem able to make about the same peak HP, but 2 lb.ft. LESS torque.

Since the TRQ curves on non-MCM and MCM bikes is a nice bell shape, this +2 lb.ft. at peak creates a HUGE difference in performance.

Also, you should know that a measurement of TRQ @ 9500 RPM between your chart above and my latest run shows you almost to 11 lb.ft. and me at 13 lb.ft.

Since you are looking for power level increases around redline (10,500 rpm) and a TRQ ramp-up closer to redline, I can understand why you could prefer standard timings even though the dyno charts indicate otherwise. The "earlier" MCM midrange "hit" is so strong that it "masks" the fact that more power is also being carried to redline.
 

Last edited by Klxster; Jul 9, 2016 at 01:31 AM.
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 02:07 AM
  #960  
Klxster's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,315
From: North Texas
1st Gear Member
Default

Thanks for posting your chart. I'm having a great time analyzing it.. It looks like a DJ128 does a pretty good job of fueling with a snorkel below 8200 rpm. That "lean-out" 8200 - 9200 hurts - probably a lotta MOPOWAH could be created there with an proper AFR.
 



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:43 PM.