KDX Snorkle cut?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2012 | 05:29 PM
  #1  
Lilyboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 80
From: Seattle
1st Gear Member
Question KDX Snorkle cut?

Hey guys, besides Rimbender, have any of you modified the KDX snorkle? Cutting the bottom off, etc.? I remember reading a thread where he did something like this, but that was the end of the conversation. Anyone else do this or something like it? Got one in hand and will throw it in when the rain stops....of course, being in Seattle, that may be in July.
 
Old Dec 10, 2012 | 05:42 PM
  #2  
Brieninsac's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,405
From: Sacramento, CA
1st Gear Member
Default

I don't know what you'd gain by doing that. You'll be find just leaving it alone.
 
Old Dec 10, 2012 | 07:41 PM
  #3  
ol'klx-er's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,800
From: kootenay country BC Canada
1st Gear Member
Talking Wow!

Originally Posted by Lilyboy
....of course, being in Seattle, that may be in July.
Such an optimist!!
 
Old Dec 10, 2012 | 07:57 PM
  #4  
Lilyboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 80
From: Seattle
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by ol'klx-er
Such an optimist!!
One can dream.....
 
Old Dec 10, 2012 | 08:53 PM
  #5  
Sharan's Avatar
Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 59
From: Nowra, Australia
Default

I did cut the stock KLX snorkel. Left approx. 1/2" on the inside. Haven't noticed any improvement whatsoever, but instead I got a small leak of filter oil after each ride.

Removed snorkel and I still get a leak. Dunno what happened, must have upset the bike somehow.

I had a lid off for a short period, but it was too noisy for me.

In short - cutting the snorkel wasn't a good idea.
 
Old Dec 11, 2012 | 04:58 AM
  #6  
RimBender's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 618
From: WA state
1st Gear Member
Default

Mine (kdx part) was shortened because it rubbed and left marks on the filter foam. Not sure it increased flow, couldn't hurt. I know pulling the (kdx) snorkle out didn't require a more main jet. It does on a kdx though...

Cutting the snorkels has been a mod done with other bikes through the years, where they felt it may un restrict flow a bit without too much increase in noise. The tttr250 comes to mind, they shortened both inside and out side the box.

The stock klx snorkle is hopeless
 
Old Dec 11, 2012 | 08:36 PM
  #7  
Lilyboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 80
From: Seattle
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by RimBender
Mine (kdx part) was shortened because it rubbed and left marks on the filter foam. Not sure it increased flow, couldn't hurt. I know pulling the (kdx) snorkle out didn't require a more main jet. It does on a kdx though...

Cutting the snorkels has been a mod done with other bikes through the years, where they felt it may un restrict flow a bit without too much increase in noise. The tttr250 comes to mind, they shortened both inside and out side the box.

The stock klx snorkle is hopeless
Yeah, my thinking is less forced air travel, the better. I'm sure there's a scientific (i.e., thrust, pressure, etc.) reasoning for shortening the distance, while increasing the volume allowed under intake conditions. Huh?
Static Pressure vs. Total, and figuring out the velocity, might actually make sense when modifying air boxes, with or without snorkles. I'm not the one to do this though. Oh well...
 

Last edited by Lilyboy; Dec 11, 2012 at 08:40 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Websurfing101
KLX 250S
71
Jan 23, 2020 08:37 PM
zzrotceh
ZZR 600
9
Feb 1, 2011 06:23 PM
a16tony
KLX 250S
16
Nov 10, 2008 04:28 AM
kawiridr04
KLX 250S
6
Feb 16, 2007 08:23 PM
Marty
KLX 250S
9
Jun 7, 2006 05:57 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:05 PM.