DJ #136 main jet - preliminary results
#1
DJ #136 main jet - preliminary results
I may only have the day @ home so I tried to make the best of it...
Took the bike for a spin - hot rodding on the street and a little offroad.
Threw in the DJ 136 and set needle back to 3rd notch.
Ran bike on same route as before doing the same hot rodding.
I am currently running the FMF system.
The bike is carbureting perfectly. The strong acceleration @ WOT that begins around 6.5k rpm has, once again, increased in intensity.
Based on previous Dyno testing and AFR charts, I expect the stock header + DG-R to benefit the most from the DJ#136. I'll swap and test ride if I have the time before returning to work...
I'm sure the increase I've already felt warrants another Dyno test session to verify and validate the power increase..
Took the bike for a spin - hot rodding on the street and a little offroad.
Threw in the DJ 136 and set needle back to 3rd notch.
Ran bike on same route as before doing the same hot rodding.
I am currently running the FMF system.
The bike is carbureting perfectly. The strong acceleration @ WOT that begins around 6.5k rpm has, once again, increased in intensity.
Based on previous Dyno testing and AFR charts, I expect the stock header + DG-R to benefit the most from the DJ#136. I'll swap and test ride if I have the time before returning to work...
I'm sure the increase I've already felt warrants another Dyno test session to verify and validate the power increase..
#2
interested to hear further results. i definately find it interesting to hear about others results, even if it dosent seem applicable to my own situation.
makes me wonder if i'm not leaving something on the table due to some oversight on my own setup.
makes me wonder if i'm not leaving something on the table due to some oversight on my own setup.
#3
The bike runs richer with the FMF system compared to the stock header + DG-R, according to my Dyno AFR charts. It is a little upsetting that the megabomb and power core 4 do not preserve the torque capability of the engine in the lower RPM range (3500 - 6500 RPM). This loss of power - compared to the DG-R + stock header - is very significant and unexpected.
Since the bike is quite a bit more lean with the DG-R, and yet the power is still significantly superior below 6.5K, and the power "dips" coincide with lean "dips", I expect a big increase with the DG-R. I did not get to test that theory .. So that has to be done next time I'm home...
Since the bike is quite a bit more lean with the DG-R, and yet the power is still significantly superior below 6.5K, and the power "dips" coincide with lean "dips", I expect a big increase with the DG-R. I did not get to test that theory .. So that has to be done next time I'm home...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post