Chain And Sprocket Sizes

Old Jun 6, 2013 | 02:32 PM
  #11  
TNC's Avatar
TNC
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,050
From: Abilene, TX
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by zippets
Why are people going with a 13 tooth sprocket there is not enough clearance to the engine case

14T / 48T is probley the best for off road riding
zippets, what may be your preference for optimum gearing may not fit everyone here. With a 13T and the stock rear sprocket, you do need to keep an eye on the swingarm rubbing block up at the pivot location, as it is getting more frequent contact. Replacing the stock rubbing blocks and guides with aftermarket setups like Hotfootmoto or such pretty much eliminates this concern, however, as the material is nearly indestructible. I run a 13/47 on my '06 KLX, but that might not be the "best" for other users and their conditions.
 
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 04:04 PM
  #12  
IDRIDR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,507
From: SW Idaho
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by chainslack
So is this true. With a new chain and 13x45/106 I will NOT be able to get sufficient chainslack.

Steve
I'm running a 45 rear now and 13, 14, or 15 CS. I have a 108 link on. I do not think a 106 will work for a 13/45.

I needed a 110 link with a 49 rear.

.
 
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 05:00 PM
  #13  
drm's Avatar
drm
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 552
From: middle tennessee; 600ft asl
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by ianmcdca
So once you go to 14/48, how much of your top end speed do you lose? And doesn't this translate into alot of shifting especially on the trails?

Ian

Check gearingcommander or the link below.

https://www.kawasakiforums.com/forum/showthread.php?p=496460#post496460


Would it make sense to add chain length data to the sheet?
 
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 05:55 PM
  #14  
Trail Blazer's Avatar
Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 34
From: Detroit, Michigan
Default

Well this gearing thing is kind of confusing to me. Can some one tell me how a 13/47 setup differs from a 14/48, in terms of increased torque?

It would seem to me that one tooth less on the front with two additional teeth on the rear (13/47) would be somewhat analogous to a 14/48 setup, which is the stock front with three added teeth to the back. Just seems like the difference between the two setups is like splitting hairs, no?
 
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 06:06 PM
  #15  
IDRIDR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,507
From: SW Idaho
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by Trail Blazer
Well this gearing thing is kind of confusing to me. Can some one tell me how a 13/47 setup differs from a 14/48, in terms of increased torque?

It would seem to me that one tooth less on the front with two additional teeth on the rear (13/47) would be somewhat analogous to a 14/48 setup, which is the stock front with three added teeth to the back. Just seems like the difference between the two setups is like splitting hairs, no?
Play with gearingcommander a little.
One smaller in front is about equal to three larger in back.
 
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 06:29 PM
  #16  
zippets's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 216
From: S.E Michigan
1st Gear Member
Default

i have gone both ways 13/47 and 24/48 i went with 14/48 becuase of the added top speed i can go 55mph with the 14/48 with no problem

13/47 was around 45 but the biggest thing i noticed was the 13 was biting into my engine case some so 14/48 was the better option
 
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 06:31 PM
  #17  
zippets's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 216
From: S.E Michigan
1st Gear Member
Default

trail blazer i have a 13/47 at my house if you want to try it out i dont think i'll be going to 13 teeth any time to soon
 
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 06:51 PM
  #18  
cmott426's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 840
From: Sandpoint Idaho
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by Trail Blazer
Well this gearing thing is kind of confusing to me. Can some one tell me how a 13/47 setup differs from a 14/48, in terms of increased torque?

It would seem to me that one tooth less on the front with two additional teeth on the rear (13/47) would be somewhat analogous to a 14/48 setup, which is the stock front with three added teeth to the back. Just seems like the difference between the two setups is like splitting hairs, no?
Stock ratio is 42/14 = 3.00 meaning the front sprocket rotates 3 revolutions for every one that the rear does.
48/14 = 3.43, or 14.3% gear reduction.
47/13 = 3.62, or 20.6% gear reduction.
6.3% difference between the two. That is actually quite a bit.
The 42/13 = 3.23, or 7.7% that is what most people use.



Originally Posted by zippets
i have gone both ways 13/47 and 24/48 i went with 14/48 becuase of the added top speed i can go 55mph with the 14/48 with no problem

13/47 was around 45 but the biggest thing i noticed was the 13 was biting into my engine case some so 14/48 was the better option
Was the sprocket biting the case or the chain? If the sprocket, then maybe it was the wrong one? I would say there are thousands of KLX’s out there with a 13 tooth sprocket. First I have heard of any problems.
 
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 07:01 PM
  #19  
zippets's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 216
From: S.E Michigan
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by cmott426
Stock ratio is 42/14 = 3.00 meaning the front sprocket rotates 3 revolutions for every one that the rear does.
48/14 = 3.43, or 14.3% gear reduction.
47/13 = 3.62, or 20.6% gear reduction.
6.3% difference between the two. That is actually quite a bit.
The 42/13 = 3.23, or 7.7% that is what most people use.




Was the sprocket biting the case or the chain? If the sprocket, then maybe it was the wrong one? I would say there are thousands of KLX’s out there with a 13 tooth sprocket. First I have heard of any problems.
o-ring chain it was apparently kawasaki did not do their stacks right to allow for the 13 tooth combo. since the chain does hit the case with a 13t chain
 
Old Jun 7, 2013 | 12:13 AM
  #20  
TNC's Avatar
TNC
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,050
From: Abilene, TX
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by zippets
o-ring chain it was apparently kawasaki did not do their stacks right to allow for the 13 tooth combo. since the chain does hit the case with a 13t chain
Where is it making contact on the engine case?
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:14 PM.