Off Topic A place to boldly go off topic. just about anything goes.
View Poll Results: KF Exit Poll - who did you vote for?
McCain / Palin
11
68.75%
Obama / Biden
4
25.00%
Barr
0
0%
Other
1
6.25%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

2008 Presidential Election KF Exit Poll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 05:08 AM
  #21  
KDXmike's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 844
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by kx slaughter king
true. i ment that it wont react like a human. we saw a bunch of videos... one was of an 8th month fetus and there was a light on the end of the telescope cam and the fetus put its hands up to block the light from its eyes. then we saw one of a 5th month and they were poking it and **** and it just laid there.so killing a ""human"" with no brain isnt putting it in pain or killing a baby because the brain is still inactive and it isnt a baby yet.

its obivious that youre killing cells, but im killing skin cells typing this... boohoo, lets save them with a skin cell friendly foam keyboard. ill go invent one now



without complicating it, what im saying is: killing braindead fetuses to save other lives from being ruined = ok.
killing babies that feel things = bad.
therefore.. 2nd term and earlier should = legal
and 3rd term should = illegal

this isnt quantum physics...
So by your logic it would be ok for someone to kill you before you were born because nobody could hear you scream? Your skin cells lost by typing on a keyboard don't have the genetic material to become a centioned life with a heart-beat and a seperate blood system. A fertalized embryo does. So your comparison lacks discernment. Children's lives start out helpless and they rely on the love of parents for their survival.

Every human being goes through stages of developement. At conception children aren't fully developed yet, but neither is my 11 month old. So your argument is not if we should be allowed to kill children but at what stage in their developement we should be allowed to.

Be thankful that your parents didn't view innocent life as calously as you apparently do.

Mike
 

Last edited by KDXmike; Nov 5, 2008 at 05:29 AM.
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 05:26 AM
  #22  
Nobrakes's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Admin
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,269
Default

So going by the results, only 9 people from this site voted in the election? That's pretty pathetic. No wonder McCain lost.
 
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 05:34 AM
  #23  
KDXmike's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 844
From: Maryland
Default

Our enemies have to be laughing their asses of at this point. I feel sorry for the soldiers that now have to salute this guy.

Buyers remorse will ensue.

Mike
 
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 05:49 AM
  #24  
Finger Mullet's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,332
Default

Originally Posted by Nobrakes
So going by the results, only 9 people from this site voted in the election? That's pretty pathetic. No wonder McCain lost.
True dat......This forum can be rather dissappointing at times to say the least.....but no traffic is no traffic......what can ya do.
 
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 12:38 PM
  #25  
Kohburn's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,655
From: Coastal NC
Default

Originally Posted by zzrick
Oh yeah...and his whole "civil defense force" idea is scary...wtf is he thinking with that?
he has to be able to police his socialist agenda after disamring the public. he doesn't even have to sensor the media when they are in his pocket already.

costa rica is probably nice this time of year
 
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 01:22 PM
  #26  
Kohburn's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,655
From: Coastal NC
Default

Originally Posted by kx slaughter king
true. i ment that it wont react like a human. we saw a bunch of videos... one was of an 8th month fetus and there was a light on the end of the telescope cam and the fetus put its hands up to block the light from its eyes. then we saw one of a 5th month and they were poking it and **** and it just laid there.so killing a ""human"" with no brain isnt putting it in pain or killing a baby because the brain is still inactive and it isnt a baby yet.

its obivious that youre killing cells, but im killing skin cells typing this... boohoo, lets save them with a skin cell friendly foam keyboard. ill go invent one now



without complicating it, what im saying is: killing braindead fetuses to save other lives from being ruined = ok.
killing babies that feel things = bad.
therefore.. 2nd term and earlier should = legal
and 3rd term should = illegal

this isnt quantum physics...
pretty twisted sense of reality there - I can guarantee you that 2nd term baby is still very much alive - my son would respond to being talked to and being pushed on by by moving around or kicking a bunch. even in the first term you can see a little human being with fingers and toes moving around of its own free will on during a sonogram.

people that support killing unborn children primarily support it for purely selfish reasons such as "it wouldn't be convenient" - those people should get tied off so they can never breed. they also tend to be the same people that want to save the criminals and not use the death penalty

if I used their logic I would go around killing all the idiots that make life difficult
 
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 01:55 PM
  #27  
zzrick's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 8,820
From: Liberty Twnshp, OH
Default

Originally Posted by kx slaughter king
true. i ment that it wont react like a human. we saw a bunch of videos... one was of an 8th month fetus and there was a light on the end of the telescope cam and the fetus put its hands up to block the light from its eyes. then we saw one of a 5th month and they were poking it and **** and it just laid there.so killing a ""human"" with no brain isnt putting it in pain or killing a baby because the brain is still inactive and it isnt a baby yet.

its obivious that youre killing cells, but im killing skin cells typing this... boohoo, lets save them with a skin cell friendly foam keyboard. ill go invent one now



without complicating it, what im saying is: killing braindead fetuses to save other lives from being ruined = ok.
killing babies that feel things = bad.
therefore.. 2nd term and earlier should = legal
and 3rd term should = illegal

this isnt quantum physics...

So...is it okay to kill a mentally retarded person because they are not the strongest...or because they wouldn't know what is happening? Note that more babies have been killed in this country than we have lost in every war combined.
 
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 01:58 PM
  #28  
zzrick's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 8,820
From: Liberty Twnshp, OH
Default

Glad you are here Kohburn...I know I always have a political ally in you

I am glad that we are having this discussion and it remains civil. That makes me proud of the forum members here!
 
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 02:05 PM
  #29  
Kohburn's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,655
From: Coastal NC
Default

Originally Posted by zzrick
Glad you are here Kohburn...I know I always have a political ally in you

I am glad that we are having this discussion and it remains civil. That makes me proud of the forum members here!
I got your back bro
 
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #30  
chik636rydr's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,327
From: ROLL TIDE ROLL!!!! ALABAMA #1 SEC CHAMPIONS!!
Default

Well peeps, I am moving to New Castle because USA is gonna suck for the next 4 years. Anyone want to go with me??
 



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:51 AM.