Smallest rear sprocket?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2015 | 01:29 AM
  #1  
snappster's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 333
From: Va Beach
1st Gear Member
Default Smallest rear sprocket?

I really love my commute on 15x39 gearing. Cruising at 70-75 mph with traffic is nice so I was wondering if anyone has knowledge on an even smaller rear sprocket for my SF. I might like to try a 15x36 to see how it goes on my interstate commute at lower rpm. Where can I get one? Do I just get any 520 sprocket with the right bolt pattern? I can live with 15x39 but want to see. Maybe I will need a 351 kit to pull a gear like that. I don't mind not pulling wheelies for commuting. I would rather give up 1st gear acceleration and gain top speed. My dirt wheel will get the 43T gear I recently sampled.
 
Old Jun 17, 2015 | 11:11 AM
  #2  
klx678's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,650
From: Delaware, Ohio
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by snappster
I really love my commute on 15x39 gearing. Cruising at 70-75 mph with traffic is nice so I was wondering if anyone has knowledge on an even smaller rear sprocket for my SF. I might like to try a 15x36 to see how it goes on my interstate commute at lower rpm. Where can I get one? Do I just get any 520 sprocket with the right bolt pattern? I can live with 15x39 but want to see. Maybe I will need a 351 kit to pull a gear like that. I don't mind not pulling wheelies for commuting. I would rather give up 1st gear acceleration and gain top speed. My dirt wheel will get the 43T gear I recently sampled.
I think Sprocket Specialists will make any size you want. Simple computer in put for the cutting process.

You are right, eventually you will hit the point where there isn't enough power to push the air. From what I felt - seat of the pants with guess work - the 15/39 is close to the max without any clean up of aerodynamics. You could consider a small windshield to help there. It will also make the commute a bit better.

Here's one I did on the KLX650 that could be done on the 250"



Mounted on the crossbar:



Smooths the wind flow, less power required to push the wind.
 
Old Jun 17, 2015 | 01:59 PM
  #3  
snappster's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 333
From: Va Beach
1st Gear Member
Default Nice

Thanks. It appears I can get any number of teeth I desire from sprocket specialists. The question I wonder is how low can I go. Will have to think a little about it.
Edit...So I lifted these words from Wiki and using the worst numbers they(http://www.wallaceracing.com/Calcula...or%20Speed.php) cite for Cd and frontal area come up with less than 15HP needed for aero and rolling resistance combined. Perhaps for commuting duty I can install lower narrow handlebars in addition to a small windscreen. Of course torque not HP is what results in tire to ground force which will be reduced as I go smaller. I think I will use KLXSTER's dyno reports and see what number crunching finds.


The dimensionless measure of drag coefficient, Cd, varies from .55 to .65 (comparable to a pickup truck), vs Cd .29 for many sports cars and even .20 for high efficiency cars. However a more relevant figure of merit, CdA, factors in the vehicle's frontal area, and thus actual power required to overcome wind resistance.[15] A typical projected frontal area for motorcycles is in the neighborhood of 2.9–3.9 sq ft (0.27–0.36 m2).
 
Attached Thumbnails Smallest rear sprocket?-mc-hp.jpg  

Last edited by snappster; Jun 17, 2015 at 02:18 PM.
Old Jun 17, 2015 | 02:07 PM
  #4  
IDRIDR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,507
From: SW Idaho
1st Gear Member
Default

If you go too low, you could also drop the front a tooth or two if needed.
 
Old Jun 18, 2015 | 10:01 PM
  #5  
snappster's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 333
From: Va Beach
1st Gear Member
Default 37T appears to be the lower limit.

I may not worry about -2T for 75 bucks. Then again, I may.




Hi Dave,
It has come to our attention you are looking for a rear sprocket for your 2009 Kawasaki KLX250F that is our PN# 287 -37 37 teeth is the lowest you can go and we can build in 520 chain pitch $64.99 plus $10.00 shipping if you are in the USA.
Thank you for your interest in our company we look forward in doing business with you.

CHRISTINE
TEAM SPROCKET SPECIALISTS
MADE IN THE U.S.A. SINCE 1950
PH 800-782-8200
FAX 435-896-2944
www.facebook.com/SprocketSpecialists618
 
Old Jun 19, 2015 | 12:41 AM
  #6  
ol'klx-er's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,800
From: kootenay country BC Canada
1st Gear Member
Default

Just took a look at their site.
They use aluminum. I think steel would be better. The slight weight penalty would be offset by the steel part lasting longer.
 
Old Jun 19, 2015 | 01:13 AM
  #7  
snappster's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 333
From: Va Beach
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by ol'klx-er
Just took a look at their site.
They use aluminum. I think steel would be better. The slight weight penalty would be offset by the steel part lasting longer.

I did not read the fine print. Guess I am sticking with the 39. No Al for commuting. Bicycles yes, moto no.
 
Old Jun 19, 2015 | 02:10 AM
  #8  
ol'klx-er's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,800
From: kootenay country BC Canada
1st Gear Member
Default

I don't even care for aluminum gears on the bicycle especially for the small front ring.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dannyaditya
Kawasaki Ninja Models
5
Dec 31, 2007 03:12 AM
Bad Bear
KLX 250S
3
Oct 8, 2006 05:56 AM
dazjr
KLX 250S
16
Aug 17, 2006 05:48 PM
57piper
KLX 250S
3
Jul 17, 2006 11:28 AM




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:12 PM.