run the KLX with no mods?

Old Jun 6, 2016 | 05:26 PM
  #31  
queen of spades's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 389
1st Gear Member
Default

Depends on which muffler I choose to run. Right now I have the 625SX unit installed. Idle's quieter than my KLX250S. Quieter everywhere except if I gun it. Then its as loud as my KLX nad Q4/QC insert.

If I run the OEM "hoover" can, the KTM is as quiet as the stock KLX exhaust.

I've owned the KTM for almost 10 years. It came with one of those old Supertrapp racing mufflers. I couldn't bear how loud it was.. took that muffler off and put it in the recycling bin.

If I plan on riding near suburban areas with houses, or anywhere there might be people/hikers/horses.. I run the quieter muffler.
 
Old Jun 6, 2016 | 06:26 PM
  #32  
Klxster's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,315
From: North Texas
1st Gear Member
Default

Interesting, I run the '08 FE650E with the stock "Acro" and the '98 FC501 with a "Big Gun" - I admit the Big Gun on that bike is "over the top" loud.
 
Old Jun 6, 2016 | 11:36 PM
  #33  
LaGrasta's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 184
1st Gear Member
Default

Thank you for all the honest opinions and results, even dyno runs. This really gave a lot to consider. Nothing I've read here has convinced me to change anything in terms of motor.

I still need to duct tape my phone to my thigh and give it a top speed run with the GPS. I'll report back, hopefully in a day or two. Let's roll!
 
Old Jun 7, 2016 | 02:52 AM
  #34  
Klxster's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,315
From: North Texas
1st Gear Member
Default

If I had a "stock" KLX that goes 97mph, I wouldn't believe anything I read in here either...lol
 

Last edited by Klxster; Jun 15, 2016 at 06:20 PM.
Old Jun 14, 2016 | 05:43 PM
  #35  
LaGrasta's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 184
1st Gear Member
Default

off by 8mph! I finally taped my GPS cell phone to my leg and without killing myself, drove the 20 miles to work today. If I tucked, it reached mid 90s, but on the GPS only read as high as 88mph max.
I was shocked at even low speeds it was off, but questioned how quickly the GPS could update itself.

At any rate, the bike does mid 80s, not mid 90s, per GPS.
 
Old Jun 14, 2016 | 05:54 PM
  #36  
Brieninsac's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,403
From: Sacramento, CA
1st Gear Member
Default

That sounds about right, the speedo is known to be off by about 10%.
 
Old Jun 16, 2016 | 05:32 AM
  #37  
Bigs's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 86
1st Gear Member
Default

In fairness GPS won't update itself often enough to be accurate for anything other than dead straight lines.

If you went round any corners on that 20 mile ride then the GPS will underestimate your speed.
 
Old Jun 16, 2016 | 02:24 PM
  #38  
old man's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 75
1st Gear Member
Default

If you are happy with stock, and can stand the tall gearing and cold starting, keep it.
You will get better mileage than we do. but not doing 88mph!
 
Old Jun 16, 2016 | 04:26 PM
  #39  
LaGrasta's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 184
1st Gear Member
Default

I haven't had a lick of difficulty with cold starting, none. In fact, as I mentioned prior, it seems like its EFI the way it starts so easily.

As for tall gearing, have to run it this way, for freeway travel (20 miles one way to work). I don't use it for normal commutes, but have taken it a bunch just the same.

Mileage, yeah I averaged high 50s this last tank, no where near 70mpg!
 
Old Jun 16, 2016 | 04:31 PM
  #40  
peabrain's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 269
1st Gear Member
Default

atm i avg 60+mpg on my 09 EFI
only mod i know off atm is snorkel removed and i do about 50% city stop and go
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:12 PM.