Let's talk about preload....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2021 | 01:40 AM
  #1  
Oldschool Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 6
Default Let's talk about preload....

I have recently spent a lot of time with some great suspension guys and have spent lots of hours talking about spring rates, preload, valving, ride height, and such. What have I walked away with?

On almost every thread that I see on this site as well as others I see and hear lots of talk about preload and how it will affect ride height but I never hear about how it affects the harshness of the ride. I implore all of you to read this link, especially the sections about "Race Sag and Spring Rates" as well as "All About Preload". brucessuspension.net

I have bought and installed new springs to only use 1/2" of preload.(I have only compressed the springs 1/2" from free length) Then I measure static sag, race sag, and total sag. For my 2006 KLX250S, my numbers are spot on....using 30% to 33% of front and rear suspension travel. Using the stock spring I had to induce way more than 1/2" preload to get the correct sag numbers, but in doing so I was adding lots and lots of stored energy in the compressed springs, which made the ride much more harsh. Going up in spring rate made a big difference and a much better ride.

"What does all this mean? Lets say your bike is equipped with a 280 lb/sq inch spring and you had to turn the preload up to 3/4 inch to achieve proper race sag, you would now have 210 pounds of stored energy. If you would install instead a 290 lb/sq inch spring and were able to drop the preload to 1/2 inch, you would now have 145 pounds of stored energy. That 290 lb/sq inch spring, preloaded to 1/2 inch, would require less force to begin movement of the rear of the bike (i.e., on a smaller bump), than would the 280 lb/sq inch spring preloaded to 3/4 inch. That 290 lb/sq inch spring would require 870 pounds of force to bottom (3 inch shock travel) compared to 840 pounds of force for the 280 lb/sq inch spring. So the heavier spring (the correct spring in this example because it achieves the proper race sag) is more progressive than the spring that was only one step too light. The correct spring will move over the small bumps better and resist bottoming better. If you require more than one step difference in spring rate, the results be much more dramatic". Bruce Triplett

 
Old May 15, 2021 | 03:49 PM
  #2  
tooter's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 477
From: Rural Unincorporated Los Angeles County
1st Gear Member
Default

Because I weigh 136 pounds and only ride asphalt, I set the rear shock lockrings so there is no preload and installed lowering links so the rear swingarm is parallel to the ground. I live in the middle a Canyon so no matter which direction I ride, it's on twisted roads so riding a bike with a low center of gravity is an advantage.

 

Last edited by tooter; May 15, 2021 at 03:53 PM.
Old May 15, 2021 | 06:26 PM
  #3  
durielk's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,728
From: Cottonwood, AZ USA
1st Gear Member
Default

I agree with Bruce.
 
Old May 17, 2021 | 05:19 AM
  #4  
TNC's Avatar
TNC
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,050
From: Abilene, TX
1st Gear Member
Default

Bruce died a short while back, but it's great someone picked up his site and is carrying the info forward. He's done as good a job at describing suspension setup and components as just about anyone I've seen in a way that most average people can understand. He's been a highly regarded and mentioned source on this and other sites for some time.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Spitfire44
KLX 250S
31
Aug 4, 2016 12:58 AM
KLXHunter
KLX 250S
50
Jun 2, 2012 08:28 PM
je2000
KLX 250S
6
Jun 24, 2009 08:37 AM
pie4foou
KLX 250S
7
Jan 29, 2008 03:52 AM
xmxracer
Ninja ZX-6R & ZX-6RR
6
Jul 2, 2006 11:29 AM




All times are GMT. The time now is 03:46 AM.