Adventures 351.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 04:53 PM
  #121  
linkin5's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 988
From: Indiana
Default

Very lucky you didn't have a JHoffy moment and scatter the thing.
 
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 04:55 PM
  #122  
EMS_0525's Avatar
Da dirty moderator
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12,584
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Anyone run a higher octane fuel in their 351?
 
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 07:07 PM
  #123  
IDRIDR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,507
From: SW Idaho
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by EMS_0525
Anyone run a higher octane fuel in their 351?
I've paid some attention to this over time as I didn't want to get a 351 that NEEDED high octane. I ride into desolate areas and need to fill with the only station around, which may be 87 or sometimes only 85. Some other riders do, but I think most don't use high octane, and I don't recall many (or any?) announcing detonation issues with low octane fuel.

That said, I'm running 91 ethanol-free for my first tank and hoping to get to the dirt this weekend for more fun and fumes.
 
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 09:23 PM
  #124  
Blackheart58's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 886
From: Northern Utah
Default

Unless you did something to run it real lean, or, to bump up the compression ratio, I bet you'll be fine with 87.
 
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 10:37 PM
  #125  
RaceGass's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,392
From: So Cal
1st Gear Member
Default

With the big bore I tried running a skosh of race gas just to see if it helped. But it seemed to run better with premium fuel. Not so with the huskys......
 
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 10:40 PM
  #126  
redpillar's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,389
From: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Default

yes 12/1
 
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 10:43 PM
  #127  
redpillar's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,389
From: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Default

Originally Posted by linkin5
Very lucky you didn't have a JHoffy moment and scatter the thing.
Yes, but lets leave JHoffy out of this. You may summon him by mentioning his name.
 
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 02:23 AM
  #128  
redpillar's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,389
From: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Default

I noticed that the shims have worn or were not very accurately manufactured. I measured with a fairly decent micrometer the intake shims were 3.08 each and the exhausts were 3.03 and 2.99 or am I being somewhat retentive here.
 
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 02:46 AM
  #129  
TNC's Avatar
TNC
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,050
From: Abilene, TX
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by redpillar
I noticed that the shims have worn or were not very accurately manufactured. I measured with a fairly decent micrometer the intake shims were 3.08 each and the exhausts were 3.03 and 2.99 or am I being somewhat retentive here.
A true micrometer or a vernier caliper? If a micrometer, what kind?
 
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 02:11 PM
  #130  
redpillar's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,389
From: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Default

It was a starrett vernier caliper I think a 799a was the model number
 



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:52 AM.