presedential race?
#15
RE: presedential race?
Sorry, I only vote for someone when I think they are worth voting for. The last time I was GONNA vote was for Perot. Then he bailed out when he would have been a landslide victor. *****.
Personally, I do not believe that my choosing the lesser of two evils is an accurate representation of my voice or what I want out of a politican. I would encourage others to do the the same. Until there is someone worth voting for - I will continue to vote with my silence. This also applies to local and state politics... when there is someone worth voting for - I vote for them. When there is not - I do not.
Personally, I do not believe that my choosing the lesser of two evils is an accurate representation of my voice or what I want out of a politican. I would encourage others to do the the same. Until there is someone worth voting for - I will continue to vote with my silence. This also applies to local and state politics... when there is someone worth voting for - I vote for them. When there is not - I do not.
#17
RE: presedential race?
Jessica Simpson for president, she's got the greatest legs in the world, and dumb enough to handle the job, probably still smarter than Bush!
Worlok14
Worlok14
#18
RE: presedential race?
At the moment I am afraid to support a Democrat because I feel that with bush's current approval rating and the fact that buch bashinghas actually become a part of todays culture, I beleive that a Dem, would spend the first month in office trying to drasticly differentiate themselves from the bush legacy. I feel that In trying to oppose the bush legacy, a Democratic president would be more prone to making mistakes. And I just plain dont like Hillary.
On the other hand John Mccain knows what its like to be in an unpopular war, and I beleive he would take the proper steps to correct that issue, in a militarily feasable manner (setting a date to end a war isn't feasible IMO) He has also shown that he will go against his party to support his own beliefs, But I dont feel that he is really prepared to handle the domestic issues.
Even though he may be weak on the home front, and as a future union worker I should vote Democrat, I would have togo Mccain cause I think he will do what is right for the troops.
On the other hand John Mccain knows what its like to be in an unpopular war, and I beleive he would take the proper steps to correct that issue, in a militarily feasable manner (setting a date to end a war isn't feasible IMO) He has also shown that he will go against his party to support his own beliefs, But I dont feel that he is really prepared to handle the domestic issues.
Even though he may be weak on the home front, and as a future union worker I should vote Democrat, I would have togo Mccain cause I think he will do what is right for the troops.
#19
RE: presedential race?
were fukked no matter who wins[:@]
barak wins = he wants to help everyone to much, tough to do when the economy is so sh!tty
hilary = idiot, and lets face it... wtf will the muslem extermeists do if we have a chick run the country??
mccain = to corrupt, ive atcually looked up things online about all the canidates and some of the things ive read about him doing [:@][][:@][] bribes, imbezzlement that sorta crap.
honestly, barak is prob the best choice IMO because he has the most experience with this stuff, he has a ****, and i never read about him doing one corrupt thing. worst case senario he tries to give to much and the economy continues its downward slope (bound to happen anyway[:@])
barak wins = he wants to help everyone to much, tough to do when the economy is so sh!tty
hilary = idiot, and lets face it... wtf will the muslem extermeists do if we have a chick run the country??
mccain = to corrupt, ive atcually looked up things online about all the canidates and some of the things ive read about him doing [:@][][:@][] bribes, imbezzlement that sorta crap.
honestly, barak is prob the best choice IMO because he has the most experience with this stuff, he has a ****, and i never read about him doing one corrupt thing. worst case senario he tries to give to much and the economy continues its downward slope (bound to happen anyway[:@])
#20
RE: presedential race?
Are you serious? Baraq isn't corrupt? Look up his buddies in Chicago. I was in line Tuesday and the people in fron tof me wanted to vote for Baraq, that poll worker asked them which party. They replied that they weren't sure, they just wanted to vote for Baraq. Awesome.[>:]
I changed parties and voted for Hillary (whom I despise), just to vote against Obama. Most republicans I know did the same, it was even on the tv and radio here, Hilary's win in Ohio was due to crossover voters trying to get rid of Obama.
I changed parties and voted for Hillary (whom I despise), just to vote against Obama. Most republicans I know did the same, it was even on the tv and radio here, Hilary's win in Ohio was due to crossover voters trying to get rid of Obama.