That might be your assessment, W, but I think it's clear the rest of us are leaning toward the the opposite conclusion.

 

A few months back a 10 year old (or so) was ran over by a woman in an SUV texting. Result, child dead, texter awaiting trial. I'm another vote for "Don't do it"

 

Goddang right horsefly!! I loves my worlok

 

Well by reading this entire thread over here is my conclusion.

Worlok you are defending a woman by thinking with your **** again… but what’s new.

Chik the more you defend yourself the more ignorant you make yourself look. As soon as I think you have hit bottom you say something else and keep digging that hole your standing in deeper.

 

Here is my conclusion:

Nobody is going to be able to change her mind. She feels entitled to do it for what ever her reasons are. Due to that entitlement nobody will ever change her mind.

Not sure what your angle in this is worlock?

However, following your friends off cliffs just because your friends do it does not help you or your friends. either way your both over the cliff.

I wish you luck and god's blessings.

 

Well I can tell you, I do not ever text while driving! And I back up Chiksta cause she's my buddy, and I definately know that nothing I can say would change her mind. So it's all good man. We are both just yanking your chain more than anything!

 

Ignorant?? Perhaps you should reevaluate your vocabulary GS. Ignorant is used to describe someone with a lack of knowledge, which after presenting me with opinionated statistics I was unable to agree with you guys. Sorry, but unless I can get conclusive unopinionated facts which do not involve test groups or skewed statistics my position will remain as stated.

Hard headed? Maybe. Nonetheless it is still entertaining watching you guys argue a debatable subject when everyone at one point has taken their eyes off the road to look at a road sign or talk to someone, whatever reason.

As far as ganging up on worlok and saying he is thinking with his ****, that is the most insane accusation i've read on this thread, which actually is quite disrespectful for you all to do. Leave him out of it because if it is beef with me you have you need to take it up with me and me only.

Like I will say again ..... next with the crappy supporting evidence. I am long winded and can do this all day.

 

Not that it will probably do any good, but ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2D3hB278Gc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5B8CCtqyNEw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDCPbUMRCXM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJyU3h0dNT0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDb-15hAtxY

http://www.automotive-fleet.com/Chan...jor-No-No.aspx

http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/wayof...while.driving/

http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/...e-driving.html

http://www.edgarsnyder.com/auto-acci...tatistics.html

http://racfoundation.wordpress.com/2...-us-teenagers/

http://www.paramuspost.com/article.p...61124185607549

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0504094434.htm

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...6-11-dwt_N.htm

http://www.webmd.com/parenting/news/...ng-and-driving

 

WOW! +1 for taking the time to look for that on the net. LOL!

 

Took about 30 seconds. If you need more, just let me know.