TWO Magazine's Review: ZX-6RR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-04-2006, 01:02 AM
arrowwhead's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 149
Default TWO Magazine's Review: ZX-6RR

This review is for a 2005 model ZX-6RR and ZX-6R 636, but seeing how they're still the same bikes, the review is still very true. Enjoy.



VERDICT:
In standard form it’s a slower and more expensive version of the R, with the race kit it gets more interesting and with a load of investment in the engine could become an utter tool. A 600 for serious racers with deep pockets only

Before any new bike can line up on a world Supersport grid, homologation rules stipulate at least 1,000 road legal units of the same basic bike must be made available to the public – Supersport is after all a roadbike-based championship. So it’s no surprise to see Kawasaki making just 1,000 of these ZX-6RRs for public consumption.

Homologation specials are nothing new but Kawasaki’s tack with the RR is somewhat different. See, with most bikes like this you’ll find them wearing more exclusive chassis components and more radical geometry than their standard roadgoing companions but this isn’t the case with the RR. It has the same frame, forks, wheels, suspension, clocks, exhaust and bodywork as the standard R version. Up close the two bikes look identical and it’s only the discreet ‘RR’ logo on the sidepanels that finally gives the game away.

The only differences you’ll find on the RR are the adjustable swingarm pivot and the smaller regulation friendly 599cc motor inside the frame with its close-ratio gearbox and slipper clutch.

So you pay a grand more and you get a slower bike, albeit one with a tricker motor. But there’s still no substitute for cubes and riding the two back to back the R murders its RR cousin across the rev range, so much so I was at least one and a half seconds a lap slower on the RR no matter what I tried.

So why should anyone buy an RR? The simple answer is that they shouldn’t. No point. Sorry. As they come the R’s the better road bike and the better track bike of the pair.

The only reason to buy an RR is to go supersport racing because at 636ccs the R is nothing less than a very unsubtle bit of cheating that’ll see you slung out of any 600cc race you care to take a crack at.
And for racing the RR suddenly begins to make sense because throw in the factory race kit (once you’ve shelled out the extra grand for it that is) and suddenly you’ve got a pretty sorted piece of racing tackle on your hands.

I say ‘pretty sorted’ because the race kit is far from comprehensive. As it stands you get a full selection of gaskets, air filters, valve springs, sprockets and camshafts, a programmable ECU (adjusts fuel mixture, ignition timing and rev limiter) with relevant connectors, a race tacho, fork spacers and springs, and a smaller generator with matching cover. Not bad value for a grand, but you’ll still want spare wheels, a steering damper and a race system at the bare minimum before taking to the track.

Properly set up with said exhaust Kawasaki claim you’ll see some 120bhp and compression up to 14.5: 1 (the R runs 12.8:1). From here the sky’s the limit depending on what level you’re competing at, how much you can bend the rules and how deep your pockets are.

In short, the ZX-6RR is a very sound building block for a serious racebike. The sublime handling and braking of the roadbike are there from the beginning and what you do with them is your business. Just don’t buy a standard RR to impress your mates at a trackday – you’ll get your *** whupped.

Source: TWO Online





[IMG]local://upfiles/1056/3F1827F8E926437DBD6583172F22D621.jpg[/IMG]
 
  #2  
Old 02-04-2006, 01:16 AM
cmk827's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 116
Default RE: TWO Magazine's Review: ZX-6RR

That's interesting...I didn't realize Kawasaki only made 1,000 of the RRs. I guess that's why you don't see many of them on the road.
 
  #3  
Old 02-04-2006, 05:00 AM
Dragone#19's Avatar
Administrator
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The Silver State
Posts: 18,288
Default RE: TWO Magazine's Review: ZX-6RR

Nice read
 
  #4  
Old 02-04-2006, 07:58 AM
xmxracer's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 230
Default RE: TWO Magazine's Review: ZX-6RR

NICE ARTICLE. 636 NEEDS NO MODS OTHER THAN THAT REFLECTOR DOWN FIN ON THE *** END.
 
  #5  
Old 02-04-2006, 08:31 AM
MAD KAW's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location:
Posts: 5,470
Default RE: TWO Magazine's Review: ZX-6RR

nice.... artical...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
VitaminE
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade Classifieds
0
07-06-2008 04:36 AM
IPM
Ninja ZX-10R
6
10-30-2006 03:10 AM
calamarichris
Ninja 500R
11
10-17-2006 08:19 PM
Marty
KLX 250S
7
10-07-2006 08:09 AM
FM_Thumper
KLX 250S
0
05-04-2006 03:26 AM



Quick Reply: TWO Magazine's Review: ZX-6RR



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:32 AM.