Speed Calculator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 06:29 PM
  #1  
drm's Avatar
drm
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 552
From: middle tennessee; 600ft asl
1st Gear Member
Cool Speed Calculator

I was curious about how the speed of the KLX250 was affected by gearing, tire sizing, etc. I know about gearing commander but wanted to work out the calculations myself.

I created a google sheet if anyone would like use it.
Speed Sheet

I have a GPS and eventually want to correlate my indicated speed to my GPS.
Long term, maybe add actual data from users to help others when a speed issue arises.

Any thoughts out there?
 
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 07:53 PM
  #2  
zippets's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 216
From: S.E Michigan
1st Gear Member
Default

i know that the stock gearing is a little low for the power output of the engine

i know that i went taller and had the bike actually hit the red line 10500 rpms

that was using 14t F / 48t R i think i was going 10500 @ 70

stock was allmost 14t F / 42t R 70 @ 7000 topped out @ 8200 rpms

im thinking if someone went 14t F / 44t R they should be able to hit well over 90 (theory)

but i believe i heard add 300 rpms per tooth in the rear
 
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:16 PM
  #3  
Brieninsac's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,405
From: Sacramento, CA
1st Gear Member
Default

Looks pretty similar to the Gearing Commander

Gearing Commander: Motorcycle Speed, RPM, Chain & Sprockets Calculator
 
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:17 PM
  #4  
cmott426's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 840
From: Sandpoint Idaho
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by zippets
i know that the stock gearing is a little low for the power output of the engine

i know that i went taller and had the bike actually hit the red line 10500 rpms

that was using 14t F / 48t R i think i was going 10500 @ 70

stock was allmost 14t F / 42t R 70 @ 7000 topped out @ 8200 rpms

im thinking if someone went 14t F / 44t R they should be able to hit well over 90 (theory)

but i believe i heard add 300 rpms per tooth in the rear
For every tooth added or subtracted from the original 42 tooth rear changes the ratio by 2.3%. (.023)

So is you are going 70 MPH with stock rear and the engine is at 7000RPM. Then if you change out to a 45 (3 teeth larger) your RPM will be 7000 times 6.9% (2.3% x 3 teeth) equals 7483 rpm.
 
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:19 PM
  #5  
cmott426's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 840
From: Sandpoint Idaho
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by zippets
i know that the stock gearing is a little low for the power output of the engine
i know that i went taller and had the bike actually hit the red line 10500 rpms

that was using 14t F / 48t R i think i was going 10500 @ 70

stock was allmost 14t F / 42t R 70 @ 7000 topped out @ 8200 rpms

im thinking if someone went 14t F / 44t R they should be able to hit well over 90 (theory)

but i believe i heard add 300 rpms per tooth in the rear
I would say it is a little high for stock power.
 
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:40 PM
  #6  
Highbeam's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 740
From: South Puget Sound, WA
Default

Yeah, zippets had it backwards. Low gearing is like first gear. Tall is like 6th.

I find the stock 14/42 gearing slightly too tall for the trail but want a taller gearing for the highway so I'm leaving it alone. Why on earth they didn't make 6th gear much taller I'll never know. We have a close ratio transmission but at least there are 6 gears.
 
Old Jun 5, 2013 | 02:07 AM
  #7  
RayCour's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 333
From: Quebec, Canada
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by Highbeam
Yeah, zippets had it backwards. Low gearing is like first gear. Tall is like 6th.

I find the stock 14/42 gearing slightly too tall for the trail but want a taller gearing for the highway so I'm leaving it alone. Why on earth they didn't make 6th gear much taller I'll never know. We have a close ratio transmission but at least there are 6 gears.
I fully agree with this: if 5 and 6 were more separated, we could gear it lower (ex: 14/46 or so) and still have reasonable rpm at highway speeds. That would be the best of both worlds: good for trails and highway. 5 and 6 are so close anyway that a little more separation would not be an annoyance.

It strikes me that Kawasaki did the reverse for the 09 and later, compared to 06-07: they made 5 and 6 closer, aggravating the situation. Apparently they thought not so many customers would have agreed with my views...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rlj
KLX 250S
3
Jan 15, 2015 09:20 PM
Einfahrt
KLX 250S
1
Mar 13, 2010 07:42 PM
shon
Off Topic
3
Jul 13, 2005 05:27 PM
shawn_460
Ninja ZX-6R & ZX-6RR
11
Jul 7, 2005 02:26 AM
greenrider
New Member Area
12
Jun 4, 2005 05:28 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 PM.