putting klx300 barrel on 2009 klx250

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2010 | 02:59 PM
  #11  
Feral Donkey's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 358
Default

Yeah, but that's what all the cool kids are doing. I don't like mullets or parachute pants. Chances are, if the bore is ok, I'll get a new set of rings and run it as is until it gives me problems then have something done to it. I don't know what that'll be yet. I do like the idea of the Nikasil plating even though the KK job is friggin expensive. I don't mind that as long as it's good. There's a few local guys who do it around here. I'll sniff around and see what I can find.
 
Old Dec 8, 2010 | 11:43 PM
  #12  
David R's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 695
From: Western NY
Wink

I would measure the ring end gap and check piston fit. If all is good like the ad says, you could just run it. Now you have a core if you decide to do something else.

Good find.

David
 
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 12:46 AM
  #13  
alexgg's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 103
Default

By the way, the 300cc piston must have the same weight as 250cc otherwise its gonna blowup the engine. I am wondering - making 350cc of the same weight would it reduce its strength and life?
 
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 01:53 AM
  #14  
Feral Donkey's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 358
Default

I'm sure it's a little heavier. I wonder if it adds vibration? That's one nice thing about the 250 is it's smooth as a baby's ***.


Ok, what about compression ratios? What compression ratio do these different big bore kits have? I keep hearing people got the KK with the high compression and there's a guy out in NJ who can do a lower compression one for you if you like.
 
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 02:18 AM
  #15  
alexgg's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 103
Default

I dont think that it is good idea to run heavier piston. It wouldnt be slight vibration - few gramms at 50000 revs gonna be few kilos blowing up your engine....
 
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 10:17 AM
  #16  
David R's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 695
From: Western NY
Default

The motor was a 300 at one time. Run the piston. I have the 351 and the piston IS heavier, but it still works fine. I have not blown it up at 10,500 rpm.

You could weigh the stock piston and weigh yours. Just run it! I suggest you DO NOT try to lighten the piston.

Think less, ride more.

David
 
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 03:04 PM
  #17  
Feral Donkey's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 358
Default

Here's another one but it's a '99. I don't know what it can fit.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Kawas...sQ5fLiterature
 
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 05:27 PM
  #18  
ManBearPig's Avatar
Junior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Default

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...m=300510652967

99 has the same part numbers as the 2000 and up according to the Motosport website. I was watching this one and hoping no one else saw it, was able to get it for just a few dollars more than the one you won.

With almost 13k on the bike I didn't want to invest the money for a BB kit. Now to wait for it to get here and see how it really looks and measures out.

Ken
 
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 05:39 PM
  #19  
Feral Donkey's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 358
Default

I'm looking for one for my friend. It is a different part from the one I have. I can tell from the pics because there's cored-out recesses in the thick sections where the base gasket goes. Mine is a '03 or '04 and it doesn't have that.
 
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 07:05 PM
  #20  
ManBearPig's Avatar
Junior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by Feral Donkey
I'm looking for one for my friend. It is a different part from the one I have. I can tell from the pics because there's cored-out recesses in the thick sections where the base gasket goes. Mine is a '03 or '04 and it doesn't have that.
I did see the small difference and believe they are minor and won't amount to much. It's not like they are water passages or anything like that. If there was that big of a difference between the 99 models and prior compared to the 2000 and newer I don't believe the parts would be listed as interchangeable.

Manufactures make changes in parts all the time for lots of reasons from cost savings, correction of problems, to changes in subcontractors. I don't believe or can find any information that the change was to correct a problem. It's not like when BMW changed the castings on the fork leg that was failing on the F650GS's, which BMW denies existed.

Ken
 



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:19 PM.