KLX 250 ( 300 ) camshaft mod by Marcelino

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #211  
Old 06-30-2011, 03:20 AM
kansas-klx's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SW of Wichita
Posts: 129
Default

Originally Posted by TNC
kansas, you're probably right on the posting fatigue. However, I too am intrigued by this mod and wonder if jhoff's experience threw a wet blanket on the issue...
Bless him, jhoff is doing what he can, but he bit down on granite by trying to do so much at once. Gotta admire his enthusiasm, though. Good attitude from what I can see.

Jhoff's travails have brought out a lot of good observations/advice from more advanced KLX'ers (certainly not me in that category) but I would discount for him concerning any negative experiences with respect to Marcelino's cam mod. Simply too much happening on his bike at once to really nail down root causes at this point.

Someone else with a 351 is trying a Marcelino mod: David R, Raytard, maybe?

I can't remember with so much activity in such a short time...
 
  #212  
Old 06-30-2011, 04:02 AM
redpillar's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Posts: 1,389
Default

I will be installing the BB kit this fall probably in September when I get back from my Idaho trip, I may do the valve timing mod first to see what kind of difference it makes and then install the big bore and return the valve timing to stock and see how it goes, then try the timing mod with the big bore and see what that does.
I was expecting Jhoffs motor to calve. It was a matter of time. I think it probably has saved him from injuring himself. Perhaps by the time he saves up enough cash to fix it he will have reflected a bit on his misdeeds and slows the **** down a bit. Especially after he talked about speed shifting it.
 
  #213  
Old 06-30-2011, 04:09 AM
Arctra's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 494
Default

Originally Posted by kansas-klx
... You're running jets of such size with a 250? What do you folks down under get from Kawi that we don't have in the U.S.?
...
If I was running those jets there would be raw fuel squirting out my exhaust!
Originally Posted by TNC
He has an FCR carb, doesn't he?
Originally Posted by kansas-klx
Still, with a 250?...
What TNC said - I am running an FCR35 carb. To be honest I'm pretty sure the pilot jet is too big - I plan on dropping it a size and playing with the a/f again. I'm actually hoping that the combo of the pumper carb and the cam mod will REALLY liven the bike up

Also, the Aus bikes have more aggressive ignition timing than the US models (if I understand WestOzKLX properly anyway).

Remember, with the 250 and a bigger carb bore there is less vacuum to suck fuel through the jets, so you need to compendate for that with larger jets. Sounds counter-intuitive to need larger jets I know, but it seems to be the way it is. You can read about the process I went through getting the carb to work here if you like (https://www.kawasakiforums.com/forum...roblems-34559/).
 
  #214  
Old 06-30-2011, 04:14 AM
jhoffy22's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 592
Default

Originally Posted by redpillar
I will be installing the BB kit this fall probably in September when I get back from my Idaho trip, I may do the valve timing mod first to see what kind of difference it makes and then install the big bore and return the valve timing to stock and see how it goes, then try the timing mod with the big bore and see what that does.
I was expecting Jhoffs motor to calve. It was a matter of time. I think it probably has saved him from injuring himself. Perhaps by the time he saves up enough cash to fix it he will have reflected a bit on his misdeeds and slows the **** down a bit. Especially after he talked about speed shifting it.
I learned my lesson...trust me. I've already got everything lined up and going to order tomorrow. Just not sure about whether I should go new or used for the head
 
  #215  
Old 06-30-2011, 05:50 AM
redpillar's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Posts: 1,389
Default

Glad to hear that. It is nice to see someone that is not afraid to dig in, but as said already you need to temper the enthusiasm a bit. Let others learn the hard way and you learn from them. I would not buy a used head unless you plan on having it thoroughly checked out by a machine shop that is familiar with head service. Too many things to go wrong. Do you still have your stock barrel and piston? If so you could use them again and save yourself some cash for a while.
 
  #216  
Old 06-30-2011, 09:19 AM
Marcelino's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Spain
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by kansas-klx
Hey Arctra,

I was looking at your signature line. You're running jets of such size with a 250? What do you folks down under get from Kawi that we don't have in the U.S.?

I have a feeling that my riding style is a bit, shall we say, milder than yours?

If I was running those jets there would be raw fuel squirting out my exhaust!

BTW, if you experiment with the camshaft mod without the ACR repositioning, the bike will ride fine but be impossible to start while hot. That's how I first tried it and I can testify to it first hand.

Good riding.
The FCR 35 and the CVK 34 ar two completly different carbs , they cannot be directly compared in so far as the jetting is concerned . they have different diameter , different jet holder ( and orifices in the jet holder ) , needle jet , needle , air jets , slides etc .
Yes running that size jets in a CVK34 would make it very rich .
 
  #217  
Old 06-30-2011, 09:28 AM
Marcelino's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Spain
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by RaceGass
the sound your hearing is people counting their change to buy the web cam. Those pictures were traumatising. $350 for the cams sounds cheap compared to the replacement parts list of that grenaded top end!
Itīs so wanderfull to live in a free world , you can choose to do une mod or another , you wonīt get punished . Me and a few others have chose to do the mod ( the mod wasnīt published only in english and only in KawasakiForums ) .
I hope you choose not to .
Your post helps exactly how ?
 
  #218  
Old 06-30-2011, 10:04 AM
Marcelino's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Spain
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by TNC
kansas, you're probably right on the posting fatigue. However, I too am intrigued by this mod and wonder if jhoff's experience threw a wet blanket on the issue. I was really more curious if someone on the forum was preparing to do a 351 where such a measurement could be undertaken while the bike is being reassembled anyway. If someone could supply a used, intact base gasket and used head gasket, the absolute closest piston/valve clearance could be checked on this new build without sacrificing a gasket set.

RaceGass, yes, I think a lot of light was shed on the Wed Cam issue, and that is always an option.

I'm still somewhat amazed that this mod would yield a 25% or so horsepower benefit...about 5hp, correct? Yes, I get the concept of moving the powerband down the range for more generally useful rpms. That's what I did with my stroked Chevy engine. I'm obviously no authority on this issue, but that's a lot of power for a relatively simple mod. Pretty impressive if everything shakes out correctly.
I think you asked this elswhere : Yes my bike is a brand new ( 3 month old ) KLX250EFI . I have now 2000 Km on it and 1000 with the cam mod .
The power and torque gains ( from 19 to 25 and from a curvy 2.0 to a flat 2.4 ) are a combination of cam mod , air filter lid removed and a mod to the factory exhaust ( butt plug ) .
Letīs not forget my bike is EFI , so itīs allways "jetted right" .
On the case of different pistons , never mind if they are original Kawasaki ones or the JE pistons the BB 351 kit uses : they can only come up to the edge of the cylinder , not higher . The head is the same , so thatīs a non-issue also .
The only variable that remains are the valve receses and , at least from the photos , they seem bigger on the JE than the original . If Jhoffy would have had some valve "kising" there should not be dirt in the receses of his piston .
They are dirty , wich indicates that the 1 valve he got slapped was open all the way ( sticky valve ) , as it hit more in the middle of the piston . That " pinging " he was hearing , a few hours right before the valveīs demise was extra clearance in his sticky valve as it was not able to follow the contour of the cam .
 

Last edited by Marcelino; 06-30-2011 at 12:25 PM.
  #219  
Old 06-30-2011, 11:04 AM
David R's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western NY
Posts: 695
Default

As far as Jhoffy bike, I have seen a piece of stuff, like head gasket, or dirt or carbon, or a screw from the carb etc. get in a cylinder and allow the valve to hit like that. One bend and its all over but the crying. As far as the timing. Look at the other thread at the webams valve timing. The 10.5* we are using is right on the border line or even more than posted there.
Even if cut in half because its a total of 10.5*.

Look Here http://klx250s.suncup.net/Cams/index.htm


Too much stuff going on right now to work on my bike for a few more days. I do not have a bore scope and will not pull the head to check clearance. I am a 30 year mechanic. Bike runs great, so I am NOT going to stick my fingers in where they don't belong. I have 4,000 smiles on the 351. 8,000 miles on the bike. It runs perfect. I may rejet when I have a spare hour so I can run with the lid on. I do not like the air cleaner bellering in my helmet. Its WAY too loud with the lid off.

David
 

Last edited by David R; 06-30-2011 at 12:15 PM.
  #220  
Old 06-30-2011, 12:59 PM
Marcelino's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Spain
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by TNC
Man, it sure has gotten quiet on this cam timing mod. So is anyone who has a 351 actually going to do a valve clearance check with the piston? Is anyone at this time preparing to install a new 351 kit who could do this check without having to disturb an already running engine? No offense to jhoff, but he did go a bit *****-nilly on his build and cam timing mod, so I'm still not sure it's an inherent problem with the 351.

Apparently it's a non-issue with the 250 if I'm reading correctly here. To confirm, Marcelino, yours is a stock 250 piston, correct? And kansas-klx, yours is a 250, right? Is everyone just mulling this issue over right now, or is that the sound of cylinder heads being removed for clearance measurement that I'm hearing?...LOL!
You are right for sure , there is a lot of silence on the 350 street , it seems everybody is sitting on their bench waiting for someone else to make a move . Hmm ... the big dogs are quiet ...
Well , you could have the answer you are looking for in about one hour or two :
Take the valve cover off , put the engine at TDC , take the tensioner and the chain off .
Then , put a straight edge so you can clearly see the number of teeth you are moving , take a straight wrench ( or a big screwdriver ) , put it in between the 2 bolts of the camshaft and turn the camshaft in the direction of the mod ( intake to the right , exhaust to the left ) ,
You donīt need to spend a penny on parts and you will have your answer right there . Just count how manny teeth you can go , ah , do not apply excesive force , once itīs stopped , stop pulling / pushing .
 


Quick Reply: KLX 250 ( 300 ) camshaft mod by Marcelino



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:51 PM.