KDX200 vs. KDX220R

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

#11

04-01-2007, 11:15 PM

mmatz

Senior Member

1st Gear Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Sep 2006

Location:

Posts: 389

RE: KDX200 vs. KDX220R

I just located one about 60 miles away. Ad reads: 2000 KAWASAKI KDX220, low miles, fast. $1400.00. I called and left a message. We'll see what happens.

#12

04-02-2007, 12:18 PM

TeamKLX250

Senior Member

1st Gear Member

Join Date: Jan 2007

Location:

Posts: 248

RE: KDX200 vs. KDX220R

Quote:

ORIGINAL: Iowaguy

don't listen to that guy- they will not be mild learner bikes. these are bikes with 30 2-stroke horsepower and are not for the faint of heart. they will explode with power unlike the KLX which in essence, is a wimp compared to the KDX's- even the 300. they would make a killer dual sport bike.

No-one said they were learner bikes just that they are mild. Compaired to a lot of 2 strokes (and a lot of modern 4 strokes) they are mild. They have a heavier flywheel than most 2 strokes and a small carb (like the KLX) combined with mild port and powervalve timing makes them an easy and mild (albeit competitive) 2 stroke. A great bike to start off trailriding. Of course they do have a 2 stroke "hit" however it's pretty tame compared to any modern 4 stroke enduro let alone a 2 stroke enduro or MX

#13

04-02-2007, 10:08 PM

Guest

Posts: n/a

RE: KDX200 vs. KDX220R

have you ridden one? not for a beginner. the 200 has a larger carb and a real carb at that compared to the KLX's. the 220 has the smaller carb of the two kdx's. I'd hate to send a beginner out on one.

#14

04-02-2007, 11:05 PM

mmatz

Senior Member

1st Gear Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Sep 2006

Location:

Posts: 389

RE: KDX200 vs. KDX220R

Well, the gal that owns the 2000 KDX220 that I called about Sunday returned my call today. I'll be driving over tomorrow to have a look. If it is in the condition that she says it is I will be bringing it home. And if it has the kind of power that everyone is saying, I may be dualsporting it to ride myself. As previously stated, I have recently done my homework and it is easy to get this bike street legal here in Colorado

#15

04-02-2007, 11:07 PM

TeamKLX250

Senior Member

1st Gear Member

Join Date: Jan 2007

Location:

Posts: 248

RE: KDX200 vs. KDX220R

Good luck let us know how it goes[8D]

#16

04-03-2007, 01:49 AM

Nobrakes

Admin

1st Gear Member

Join Date: Jan 2006

Posts: 7,269

RE: KDX200 vs. KDX220R

Good luck, Matt. Post photos!

#17

04-03-2007, 02:40 AM

IchWarriorMkII

Senior Member

Join Date: May 2006

Location:

Posts: 226

RE: KDX200 vs. KDX220R

Welcome to the dark side

Im very interested to see how you go about dual sporting, and how the process works...

Beacause Im seriously procrastinating my WR dual sport job

#18

04-04-2007, 08:26 PM

mmatz

Senior Member

1st Gear Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Sep 2006

Location:

Posts: 389

RE: KDX200 vs. KDX220R

Well, I went and looked at the 2000 KDX220 yesterday. It was more used than the gal that owns it said it was. I declined. The other thing is that I ride mostly trails and fire roads. The KDX did not have a wide enough gear ratio. First is about right for trails but then the top end wasn't there for fire roads. Idid like the power though.

#19

04-05-2007, 02:53 AM

KAWASAKIspeed

Senior Member

1st Gear Member

Join Date: Apr 2006

Location:

Posts: 223

RE: KDX200 vs. KDX220R

Quote:

ORIGINAL: IchWarriorMkII

Quote:

ORIGINAL: deej

A two stroke for family and friends? Hmmmm, Don't you like them?

Unless they have a lot of experience riding, I would get a 125 4 strokefor them.

Why do you say that?

I always had the impression the KDX bikes were mildly tuned to offer more mid range power, for trails and mild riding. Definately not the power band of any MX bike that hits hard and is violent when you hit the power band.

Yes you are kinda right on the mild down part but that is only half the story. the KDX220 has a hevier crank shaft on it so it lugs around better for the mountains. the 200 is the exact oposite they built that with a lighter crank that is why somany people say that the 200 is so much faster. mmatz i would go with the 220 in my opinion a better bike and alot more ride able unless you really want to bring back your racing years. good luck both are great bikes just depends on what you are going to use them for.