I'm going to de smog my junk.
#11
And with the Air Injection System removed, there is one less component to fail and leave you stranded. Imagine that reed valve to become stuck open, the system would turn into an unintentional EGR device
#12
yup
Like buying a season ski pass at my local hill. The first day is $225. After that, every day is FREE!
Like buying a season ski pass at my local hill. The first day is $225. After that, every day is FREE!
Last edited by IDRIDR; 07-31-2014 at 04:12 AM.
#13
When I first got my bike I added a small K&N filter to the top of the hose coming off the reed valve plate thing. I didn't run good just leaving the hose open to atmosphere.
#14
Thanks guys. I'll dig into it and get some junk off my bike. I think I'll make shift a block off plate or something I can sandwich in between the reed valve and cover. Later on I plan on buying a 492 dollar block off plate that comes with a free 331BB but until then I'll just rig it up.
Also IDRIDR, I know your just busting my ***** a bit but I'm all for clean air. I just hate the useless mess of crap under the tank. My bike is my daily driver and I figure it could never be as dirty as my 15 mpg Jeep or my 66 GT with a 289 and 4 barrel.
Lastly, I remember when I did my FMF Q4 last year someone said omitting this should clean up the exhaust popping on decel. I've got my jetting sorted out nicely and zero exhaust leaks for sure so if this helps that would be sweet.
Also IDRIDR, I know your just busting my ***** a bit but I'm all for clean air. I just hate the useless mess of crap under the tank. My bike is my daily driver and I figure it could never be as dirty as my 15 mpg Jeep or my 66 GT with a 289 and 4 barrel.
Lastly, I remember when I did my FMF Q4 last year someone said omitting this should clean up the exhaust popping on decel. I've got my jetting sorted out nicely and zero exhaust leaks for sure so if this helps that would be sweet.
A member in Asia recently said he'd be selling his 331 cheap in the near future
#15
Light Trucks (aka SUVs) Carbon Monoxide 6.2 grams/kilometer Hydrocarbons 0.5 g/km
Motorcycles Carbon Monoxide 12 grams/kilometer Hydrocarbons 5 g/km
Cars are: 2, 0.24
Cars and SUVs have; fuel injection systems with O2 sensors to limit CO and HC, careful cylinder head design to limit NOx, and cats to burn up all of the above. The stuff works well, so, as hard as it is to believe, an SUV puts out less crud than a motorcycle without the above controls. Car standards are tighter and there is pressure to limit SUVs similarly to cars (which is why Ford is trying to do something "voluntarily").
BTW, the motorcycle standards haven't been tightened in years, perhaps because EPA has bought the argument that there aren't enough cycles to matter (California and several foreign countries have doubts about that).
I'm _not_ saying cycles should be controlled more or that anyone's evil. Just don't assume you're doing better things for smog by riding a typical cycle instead of driving a car or even an SUV. Unfortunately, the opposite is true.
Last edited by panthercity; 07-31-2014 at 03:22 PM.
#16
Panther, those are federal max regs, correct? I wonder what a given motorcycle is actually expelling in real emissions? With the advent of FI on bikes and other emission mods, I'll bet the motorcycle is generally closer to than farther away from today's cars/SUVs. I'd argue that it is true that the dreaded carbon footprint of true off road motorcycles is quite small in the big picture.
#17
Panther, those are federal max regs, correct? I wonder what a given motorcycle is actually expelling in real emissions? With the advent of FI on bikes and other emission mods, I'll bet the motorcycle is generally closer to than farther away from today's cars/SUVs. I'd argue that it is true that the dreaded carbon footprint of true off road motorcycles is quite small in the big picture.
It's also my understanding that the fuel injection system on recent motorcycle models is a much less sophisticated system than that found on modern automobiles, and thus less environmentally efficient. The FI on bikes does not include an O2 sensor or other sensors to adjust the system.
Also, referring to "other emission mods": Isn't that what this thread is trying to justify the removal of?
Agreed, our collective carbon footprint is small because the few motorcycles compared to cars, but an individual motorcycle may not be as clean as we'd like to believe.
Great topic!
#18
Panther, those are federal max regs, correct? I wonder what a given motorcycle is actually expelling in real emissions? With the advent of FI on bikes and other emission mods, I'll bet the motorcycle is generally closer to than farther away from today's cars/SUVs. I'd argue that it is true that the dreaded carbon footprint of true off road motorcycles is quite small in the big picture.
http://motorcycles.about.com/b/2011/...-than-cars.htm
Here's a small article about it, google it and I'm sure the video will pop up
#19
Unscientific anecdote
Moved to Tucson in 1997 with a 49 state 1994 KLR650. More than once when going in for the annual emissions testing the technician had to call his supervisor over to see if there wasn't something wrong with the equipment or his technique because he couldn't get a believable reading (and it wasn't because it was so high). So I have a hard time thinking that motorcycles with or without the CA stuff leave much of a footprint. Moved to a different county in AZ in 2003 where they don't do testing of emissions on vehicles, and sometime since that move they stopped doing emission testing of motorcycles in Tucson or Phoenix.