Idle Fuel Wastage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2010 | 04:34 PM
  #1  
Savagekilla's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 370
From: Colombo 7, Sri Lanka
Default Idle Fuel Wastage

Heyy guys after a long time! Last friday I took my bike for an emission test as I need to get it done ever year to renew my registration.. My KLX passed the test and I got the result.. They only check the Emission at Idle (1250 RPM) and at 2500 RPM.. The Result showed that at Idle theres a fuel wastage of 25.44% Per Litre and at 2500 RPM theres a wastage of 24.21%. What do you guys think I should do? Just forget it or?

My Jetting is:
38 Pilot/Needle on 3rd position/About 2.5 Turns on fuel screw

What do you guys think i should play around with?

Thanks alot!
Jamie
 
Old May 23, 2010 | 05:46 PM
  #2  
TNC's Avatar
TNC
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,050
From: Abilene, TX
1st Gear Member
Default

Do you have other mods to the bike?...pipe, airbox, etc? My '06 KLX250S with 300 cylinder, full Muzzy exhaust, and opened airbox only requires a 35 pilot jet. There are so many variables to consider such as altutude and such.
 
Old May 23, 2010 | 06:45 PM
  #3  
ol'klx-er's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,800
From: kootenay country BC Canada
1st Gear Member
Default

If the bike runs fine just leave it be. That readout is probably only relevant to their test criteria. Unless you're an engineer and know ALL the parameters of that test: Forgetaboutit!
 
Old May 23, 2010 | 08:05 PM
  #4  
punkenduro09's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,439
From: Murrieta, Ca
Default

sounds like there coping kkkalifornia and want you to run leaner and leaner till you burn up you motor. if you passed, just leave it.
 
Old May 23, 2010 | 08:14 PM
  #5  
RimBender's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 618
From: WA state
1st Gear Member
Default

25% above who's baseline? an automobile can get by with a little lean surge and an occasional lean misfire in one of the cylinders. Due to it's mass you are so disconnected you don't even notice it. Bike's you'll feel it so like to be a little richer than what today's standards are for emissions. That said, my bike also dials in better with the stock 35 PJ, and the mix only at ~1.5. YMMV
 

Last edited by RimBender; May 23, 2010 at 08:19 PM.
Old May 23, 2010 | 09:31 PM
  #6  
LearjetMinako's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,102
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Default

If it waste fuel at that low of RPM's, just turn back the idle fuel mixture screw. Should lean it up some.

If you pass the E/M test and you really don't care idle waste fuel, then let it be.
 
Old May 23, 2010 | 10:09 PM
  #7  
TNC's Avatar
TNC
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,050
From: Abilene, TX
1st Gear Member
Default

I don't know. I think it's fine to pursue exacting fuel mixture. It definitely may not be worth losing sleep over, but it's nice to have a carb running at the edge of perfection when possible. It also helps to increase overall fuel mileage and carbon buildup to some degree. That said, I'm not totally up on the emission testing results and what it means in the real world of carb jetting. My understanding is that it takes an oxygen sensor in the head pipe to really dial in a carb or a fuel injection system to perfection. Tailpipe readouts like you get in an emission test may not be the best way to analyze your optimum fuel mixture.
 
Old May 24, 2010 | 12:14 AM
  #8  
GaryC's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 542
Default

What was the barometric pressure that day? what time was it?
what was the air temperature? what was the engine temperature?
But most of all,,,, how does the bike run?
emission A/F ratios are much leaner than peak HP or torque ratios.
Personally, i would jet it to make the most HP/Torque, not to please the State emission regulators. You have a 250cc engine that needs all the help it can get.
25% rich mixture on your bike equates to a 2.5% rich mixture on a 2.5L car engine.
see this thread if you really are interested.
http://www.bristoldyno.com/tech/airfuel.htm
 
Old May 24, 2010 | 12:42 AM
  #9  
RimBender's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 618
From: WA state
1st Gear Member
Default

Did they give you a print out showing CO , HC, and NOx+HC ? You could have numbers that were fine for a year 2000 standard, but today your "wasting fuel".
 
Old May 24, 2010 | 02:50 AM
  #10  
redpillar's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,389
From: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Default

Fuggedaboutit
 



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13 AM.