DR-Z 400 SM? Enuff power?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 03:07 AM
  #31  
bryantjt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,689
1st Gear Member
Default RE: .

Geez Brian, this is a family site watch your language would ya?!

......KTM RFS is a **** cat when it comes to......

Besides, I'm of the opinion that KTM maintenance is a myth/rumor spread by KTM owners so everyone else thinks there is a high price to pay for the fun they are having Good thing we have Brian to set us straight
 
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 04:32 AM
  #33  
Nobrakes's Avatar
Admin
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,269
Default RE: .

Jeez, if you're gonna quote me, at least get it right. I said a DRZ "had kind've grown on me" and would be OK for a daily commuter, but given that my primary purpose is off-road, I'll take the more off-road oriented machine and trade-off road comfort. I'd hardly call that turning my head, more like it is less ugly to me now. But you do always seem to perceive reality through an ultra-high index distortion field, so I guess I'm not surprised at what you think I might have said. I still have a copy in my inbox so I can resend it to you if you want.

But the way you're talking about it on the road now, I'm thinking the DRZ is not even all that comfortable on the road. With the wide ratio tranny on the KTM EXC, 55 MPH is only about 4500 to 5000 RPM so the engine is just loafing along at highway speeds. 75 and higher would be no problem but I don't recommend this bike for the interstate - it's definitely the wrong tool for that job.

But I knew all about that before I bought it - I downloaded the owners manuals for each one and calculated what the RPMs would be for both the KTM EXC as well as the TE450 - the two main bikes I was considering, and compared them to what I knew about the KLX tranny for the various gearing ratios. All the ratios are published all the way down to the primary from the crank to the clutch. The tranny ratios turned out to be one of the deciding factors for me between the KTM and the Husqvarna as the TE had a very narrow gear spacing, even though it has 6 gears. The KTM EXC tranny is actually just a spec more narrow than the KLX. But with the big bore, you don't need as low of a 1st gear which allows you to have much taller gearing up top.

You should have done the same before you bought the DRZ and you would have known that without a 6th gear it would be buzzy on the highway.
 
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 04:47 AM
  #34  
Nobrakes's Avatar
Admin
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,269
Default RE: .


ORIGINAL: bryantjt

Geez Brian, this is a family site watch your language would ya?!

......KTM RFS is a **** cat when it comes to......
The sensorship here cracks me up. Let's try this ... p u s s y cat. Did that work?

Besides, I'm of the opinion that KTM maintenance is a myth/rumor spread by KTM owners so everyone else thinks there is a high price to pay for the fun they are having Good thing we have Brian to set us straight
I'm here for ya, man.
 
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 04:17 PM
  #36  
poodlenuts's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,078
From: cave junction or
Default RE: .

I like thelooks DRZSM, but being where I live and the kind of riding I do, it wouldnt have work right for me.
I think it would be fun bike to rip around the city with.[8D]
 
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 04:20 PM
  #37  
bryantjt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,689
1st Gear Member
Default RE: .

KTM's seem to hold their resale value as well, at least in the Flea Market on advrider they do. Bikes shouldn't be treated like an investment opportunity, they are nothing more than a toy to most of us. I don't think anyone has bought any bike, car, "toy" thinking, "Boy, in a year I bet I can sell this for almost what I paid for it!" While it would be nice to be able to trade up all the time, its not that kind of market. IG managed to make out so well on both sales because A) he seems to be pretty intense when it comes to anything, maintenance or otherwise and B) they were low mileage and in almost show room condition. Now that I'm completely off topic from the original post and still trying to wake up on my lunch hour I guess I'll retire to the shadows and watch this carry on
 
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 07:45 PM
  #38  
tennisman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 116
From:
Default RE: DR-Z 400 SM? Enuff power?

ORIGINAL: tennisman
I'd like to go SM model and throw some Distanzias on it for fire roads, moderate trails, etc.
[/align][/align]
How 'bout this part? Is it ok for moderate trails, fire roads, etc.?
 
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 10:03 PM
  #39  
Nobrakes's Avatar
Admin
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,269
Default RE: .


ORIGINAL: Iowaguy

okay, it grew on you but still hadn't turned your head.
So let me get this straight - you are saying you know my personal preferences better than I do. Where do you come up with this stuff???

The DRZSM isn't bad on the highway in stock form. Do your little research and I'm sure you'll find out. It comes with 41/15 gearing stock. Obviously it didn't bother me too much or I wouldn't have installed a 44-tooth in the rear. I didn't buy it to tour on so it really didn't bother me too much. Heck, even with my KLX I was searching for a 7th gear. The good thing about not buying $8000 dirt bikes is that once you're bored of them you can sell them and get pretty much all your money back on them like I did with both my KLX and the DRZSM. The DRZSM in some locations is pretty scarce demanding a close to retail if not higher price which is why the buyer of mine drove all the way up from New Mexico to buy it. The buyer saved close to $1000 off a new one and it only cost me $400 to drive it all summer.
What you fail to grasp here is I could care less about the DRZ in any of its incarnations. It was never a consideration for me when I was in the bike buying mood this spring. Let me see if I can make this a little more clear:



 
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 10:06 PM
  #40  
hoedogg's Avatar
Administrator
1st Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 17,484
From: bay area cali
Default RE: .

[sm=funnypostabove.gif]
 



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:27 PM.