Another '09 Review
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 47
From: Columbus, Ohio
Another '09 Review
I just found this and thought I'd pass along:
http://www.motorcycle.com/manufactur...iew-79658.html
Where did the 16 pounds of extra weight come from? I know the spokes are thicker and the brake pads larger, but where is the bloat? Still, it was a very positive review.
Jeff
http://www.motorcycle.com/manufactur...iew-79658.html
Where did the 16 pounds of extra weight come from? I know the spokes are thicker and the brake pads larger, but where is the bloat? Still, it was a very positive review.
Jeff
Your Humble Moderator/Admin
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 21,060
From: Washington
1st Gear Member
RE: Another '09 Review
That's weird, it claims to get 50 mpg. Uhhhhh I get a consistent 60 and that's with the full muzzy, jetting 132 and 40, no air box lid, and 13-45 sprockets. Explain that to me.
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 47
From: Columbus, Ohio
RE: Another '09 Review
ORIGINAL: deej
That's weird, it claims to get 50 mpg. Uhhhhh I get a consistent 60 and that's with the full muzzy, jetting 132 and 40, no air box lid, and 13-45 sprockets. Explain that to me.
That's weird, it claims to get 50 mpg. Uhhhhh I get a consistent 60 and that's with the full muzzy, jetting 132 and 40, no air box lid, and 13-45 sprockets. Explain that to me.
]
Your Humble Moderator/Admin
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 21,060
From: Washington
1st Gear Member
RE: Another '09 Review
ORIGINAL: SherpaDude
Yeah, I found that odd, too. Maybe it's all thatadded weight? []
ORIGINAL: deej
That's weird, it claims to get 50 mpg. Uhhhhh I get a consistent 60 and that's with the full muzzy, jetting 132 and 40, no air box lid, and 13-45 sprockets. Explain that to me.
That's weird, it claims to get 50 mpg. Uhhhhh I get a consistent 60 and that's with the full muzzy, jetting 132 and 40, no air box lid, and 13-45 sprockets. Explain that to me.
]
Well if we go by that theory, then with me on my bike I should be getting 10 mpg..[8D][8D][8D].............wait............[&:]..
Or if I could lose 75 lbs, then I would get 100 mpg? I'm confused now.
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 47
From: Columbus, Ohio
RE: Another '09 Review
ORIGINAL: KDXmike
Worse than that it says "nearly" 50mpg. Where's IG? We need to get this straightened out
Mike
Worse than that it says "nearly" 50mpg. Where's IG? We need to get this straightened out
Mike
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,036
From:
RE: Another '09 Review
ORIGINAL: KDXmike
Worse than that it says "nearly" 50mpg. Where's IG? We need to get this straightened out
Mike
Worse than that it says "nearly" 50mpg. Where's IG? We need to get this straightened out
Mike
