Removing Secondary Throttle Blade - Yay or Nay?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-08-2015, 12:40 PM
outrecording's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 292
Default Removing Secondary Throttle Blade - Yay or Nay?

Who here has removed the secondary throttle blade? I can't find a post here or anywhere that's specific to the KLX on how to do this.

On some other forums there's talk back and forth whether it's a good mod to do or not. What exactly happens when you remove it? Is it simply allowing more air getting in...or?
 
  #2  
Old 10-08-2015, 03:14 PM
IDRIDR's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 4,507
Default

Secondary throttle blade? You mean the butterfly valve on the engine-side of the carb, down-flow of the slider? Remove it and I think your bike will run WOT throttle all the time. You won't need to twist that thing on the right handlebar. Should be fun!
 
  #3  
Old 10-08-2015, 05:49 PM
outrecording's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 292
Default

Maybe it's an EFI thing. Not sure if there's a difference. On the EJK website under recommended settings they have one for:

"FMF Mega Bomb Full System
K&N air filter, secondary throttle blade removed, airbox snorkel removed, backfire screen removed"
 
  #4  
Old 10-08-2015, 07:18 PM
IDRIDR's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 4,507
Default

^ That makes a lot more sense!!!
I didn't look at your location and just was thinking my carb'd model would be a challenge to ride without the butterfly valve.

If you find out more, post it up here for the lucky owners with EFI.
 
  #5  
Old 10-09-2015, 04:11 AM
GBAUTO's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Young Harris, GA
Posts: 726
Default

The secondary blade is usually controlled by the ecm to try and produce a flat torque curve. On the mega power 250 I dont think that it's going to have any real effect if it's there or not...
 
  #6  
Old 10-11-2015, 04:36 AM
JoelThailand's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Phuket, Thailand
Posts: 516
Default

Don't really have any before & after hp figures but i'm sure the bike runs better without it IMHO! They are usually only fitted for smoothing out torque, emissions testing & noise control.

The diameter of the throttle body & the cams are the only real restrictions to tuning a EFI big bore bike, so taking out the secondary butterfly probably helps with better air flow & who knows what the ecm is actually doing to the butterfly at higher rpm's! Better out than in

Pretty easy to take out.
 

Last edited by JoelThailand; 10-11-2015 at 05:03 AM.
  #7  
Old 10-16-2015, 08:54 AM
outrecording's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 292
Default

Originally Posted by JoelThailand
Don't really have any before & after hp figures but i'm sure the bike runs better without it IMHO! They are usually only fitted for smoothing out torque, emissions testing & noise control.

The diameter of the throttle body & the cams are the only real restrictions to tuning a EFI big bore bike, so taking out the secondary butterfly probably helps with better air flow & who knows what the ecm is actually doing to the butterfly at higher rpm's! Better out than in

Pretty easy to take out.
Thanks for that Joel.

From what I'm reading about other bikes, they say there's more power down low. Maybe only up to a certain RPM. (Some others saying different; power across the board) Probably depends on the bike and other factors.

Are you seeing more power down low or evenly across the whole power range, Joel?
 
  #8  
Old 10-17-2015, 04:16 AM
JoelThailand's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Phuket, Thailand
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by outrecording
.

Are you seeing more power down low or evenly across the whole power range, Joel?
Sorry just can't give you a definitive answer on that, as I took out the butterfly just after fitting a 331 big bore kit. The torque boost is night & day from a stock 250! I can't imagine my bike could run any smoother low down in the rev range with a butterfly fitted, so i'm happy it's out.
 
  #9  
Old 10-08-2022, 01:30 AM
Peter Leif Lindvall's Avatar
Junior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by outrecording
Thanks for that Joel.

From what I'm reading about other bikes, they say there's more power down low. Maybe only up to a certain RPM. (Some others saying different; power across the board) Probably depends on the bike and other factors.

Are you seeing more power down low or evenly across the whole power range, Joel?
On a 250/300 it gives you instant throttle response at any RPM, and totally worth doing.

I had a Powercommander fuelcontroller, Q4 and Powerbomb, HiFlo air filter, no lid on my 2018 KLX250 and I felt I needed a 300CC jug.

I removed the secondary throttle plate, and the backfire screen, and installed one of my Kawazaki O2 deletes at the same time, and it transformed my bike, and the 250 is plenty for trails now, and the time delay hesitation is gone.. Turns out that Dynojet and Dobeck used to include an O2 delete for good reason.
 

Last edited by Peter Leif Lindvall; 10-08-2022 at 07:57 PM.
  #10  
Old 10-08-2022, 04:14 PM
tooter's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Rural Unincorporated Los Angeles County
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by Peter Leif Lindvall
On a 250/300 it gives you instant throttle response at any RPM, and totally worth doing.

I had a Powercommander fuelcontroller, Q4 and Powerbomb, HiFlo air filter, no lid on my 2018 KLX250 and I felt I needed a 300CC jug.

I removed the secondary throttle plate, and the backfire screen, and installed one of my Kawazaki O2 deletes at the same time, and it transformed my bike, and the 250 is plenty for trails now, and the time delay hesitation is gone.. Turns out that Dynojet and Dobeck used to include an O2 delete...
I paired the secondary throttle plate delete mod with my primary throttle plate ECU control spring delete mod.





The Ecu delays closing the primary throttle plate which reduces engine braking, and also holds the plate open for that irritating manic fast cold idle. Simply removing that spring frees the primary throttle plate from ALL ECU controls. The engine still cold starts and runs just fine because the cold mixture is still rich, it simply idles at the same 1,500 rpms as when the engine is hot..


Try it, you might like it. If you don't, it's easily reversabie.



I live in a canyon so all the asphalt I ride on is twisted. Having instant deceleration engine braking from an instantly fully closed primary throttle plate is a great help in cornering.
 

Last edited by tooter; 10-08-2022 at 04:17 PM.


Quick Reply: Removing Secondary Throttle Blade - Yay or Nay?



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:52 PM.