The B-17 of Bikes!
#11
RE: The B-17 of Bikes!
Almost? come on man.
I forgot what type of plane it was on, but there was one with a straight six and the cylinders were too high and obstructed the pilots veiw so they just flipped the engine upside down, and no I dont know the specifics of operational oil sumps and pickups so dont ask.
I forgot what type of plane it was on, but there was one with a straight six and the cylinders were too high and obstructed the pilots veiw so they just flipped the engine upside down, and no I dont know the specifics of operational oil sumps and pickups so dont ask.
#12
RE: The B-17 of Bikes!
#14
RE: The B-17 of Bikes!
good set of maps and a VOR or two to help out, nothing wrong with navigation.I've never flown outside of the university using anything other than plain old Pilotage and Dead Reconing, never had to. One time I did a cross country flight 50nm each way to an airport I'd never been to from an airport I'd only flown from twice, and didnt even bother with bringing a map.
My brothers wife would have been pissed if I got us lost...
My brothers wife would have been pissed if I got us lost...
#15
RE: The B-17 of Bikes!
I don't have the math background for navigation. I'd be a damn good VFR pilot if I could get the navigation down. I really don't see how IFR pilot's do it.
#17
RE: The B-17 of Bikes!
http://www.rotecradialengines.com/0RotecR2800/R2800.htm
110hp rated, 172 cubic inches (2.8 liters), 224lbs dry - i wouldn't want it on a bike.
110hp rated, 172 cubic inches (2.8 liters), 224lbs dry - i wouldn't want it on a bike.
#18
RE: The B-17 of Bikes!
ORIGINAL: rocketrotary
I don't have the math background for navigation. I'd be a damn good VFR pilot if I could get the navigation down. I really don't see how IFR pilot's do it.
I don't have the math background for navigation. I'd be a damn good VFR pilot if I could get the navigation down. I really don't see how IFR pilot's do it.
Or you could just go to http://www.fltplan.com/AwFmsNewFlt.e...amp;end=MSGend
#19
RE: The B-17 of Bikes!
ORIGINAL: rocketrotary
That's why Japanese Zero's could turn really well in one direction, and not so well in the other... they had to deal with the torque of the turning radial engine assisting or handicapping their turns. I tell you what Prom... I almost missground school!
That's why Japanese Zero's could turn really well in one direction, and not so well in the other... they had to deal with the torque of the turning radial engine assisting or handicapping their turns. I tell you what Prom... I almost missground school!
The P51 Mustang and the P63 Kingcobra were some of only a few American planes that could hang with the Zero.
#20
RE: The B-17 of Bikes!
Except the fact that the F6F Hellcat was a redesign of the F4F Wildcat with the purpose of going toe to toe with the Zero and became the most sucessful fighter aircraft of all time with over 5000 kills many of which were Zeros. The mustang had a relatively limited deployment in the Pacific Theater and did little to turn the tide of the war in the Pacific. Check out "The Zero Killer" on Dogfights.
Edit: BTW The F6 was a hideous aircraft compared the the beauty of the P-51
Edit: BTW The F6 was a hideous aircraft compared the the beauty of the P-51
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post