good tire combos
What do you guys think is the best combination? Of course, it depends on what you're riding most and where you're at and so on and so forth, but what are you riding now and what do you recommend? I ride 10 miles and back to work 5 days a week, want something that rips in the dirt and doesn't wear out too fast, on my old bike i used to run TW302's and I wanted something definitely more knobby. I was planning on ordering 606's, but what size fits the rear for an 09? I called into my local shop and he said the smallest was 120.
|
Front Tire Size: 80/100x21
Rear Tire Size: 100/100x18 not sure, but doesn't look like the 606 come in the oem size....maybe 90/90x21 front and might have to go super wide to 120/90x18 for the 606...i'm just going by what i see at http://www.newportcycleparts.com/cat...unlop_dirt.htm guess according to http://www.dunlopmotorcycle.com/tire...dventure/d606/ ..what i see is fairly correct... |
if you don't want to go with fat tires, you can go with other brands like.....kenda k270...bridgestone, irc and shinko all make more road friendly tires too....
http://images.motorcycle-superstore....Front_Tire.jpghttp://images.motorcycle-superstore....Front_Tire.jpghttp://images.motorcycle-superstore....Front_Tire.jpg kenda k760..appears to be more of an aggressive dirt tire and still dot approved for highways...same for the irc battle rally..or pirelli xcmh http://images.motorcycle-superstore....Front_Tire.jpghttp://images.motorcycle-superstore....Front_Tire.jpghttp://images.motorcycle-superstore....Front_Tire.jpg |
Do not put a K270 on the front of your bike. Great on the road, not so in the dirt. I loved the K270/rear and Millville sticky/front combo. Great on and off road, and very long lasting.
I used the K270 4.50/18. That's the one to use. For some reason the 4.60/18 is a smaller tire. |
Uh oh!...a tire thread. Aren't those about like oil threads?:D
Whip, do you require DOT tires for your consideration? This used to not be a big deal, but I see more and more rangers even in rural areas actually checking such things when they stop you on public roads. Don't know if it's revenue related, political, or what...but something to think about. |
This year I am trying a set of Dunlop MX71 front and back, for the tour of idaho. I have liked the dunlop 606s and MT 21 fornt and back and the MT 43 pirelli trial tire was really nice.
|
I'm running the d606 rear and a Pirelli rally pro front, it is basically a knobby. It handles like a dream on or off road. Super impressed, will not change the combination.
|
what size is your 606? 120?
|
Originally Posted by zomby woof
(Post 475942)
Do not put a K270 on the front of your bike. Great on the road, not so in the dirt. I loved the K270/rear and Millville sticky/front combo. Great on and off road, and very long lasting.
I used the K270 4.50/18. That's the one to use. For some reason the 4.60/18 is a smaller tire. |
Originally Posted by djchan
(Post 476017)
Youch. I just put a 270 on the front in order to pass inspection. It does feel really good onroad but I have yet to thrash it offroad. Looks like it would be good on the rocky trails I ride with the smaller knobs - almost like a trials tire. Only time will tell.
|
Originally Posted by djchan
(Post 476017)
Youch. I just put a 270 on the front in order to pass inspection. It does feel really good onroad but I have yet to thrash it offroad. Looks like it would be good on the rocky trails I ride with the smaller knobs - almost like a trials tire. Only time will tell.
|
FWIW, I have about 25,000 miles on Duro Median HF903/904 on a KLX650. My brother did DOT knobbies on his NX650 Honda - lasted 1000 miles. Great off road, but burn fast on road. I have been off road with the Duros, not anything like knobbies, but as good as or better than those you pictured. About $120 a pair, last me about 4000 miles before the rear is too lacking in tread for traction on dirt/gravel, then I swap out both. They have dealt with the mud and clay I've encountered and stick as well as any tire I've run, including the older tread Avon Gripsters (aka Slipsters when on dirt/gravel) which stuck like glue on the road.
Whether you want to try them is up to you. I still run them because they worked so well and at $120 a set I just couldn't beat them with anything else. I took the chance when I was laid off, working part time at the bike shop, and couldn't afford more money. At this point I could put on whatever I want, but stick with what has proven to work and be very affordable to replace when they quit working. I also did a 12 mile commute to work nearly year around, then a 60 mile one way commute when teaching school. During that time we did lots of playing around on dirt/gravel roads with the occasional decent trail. The tires are less an issue than the sheer weight of the 650 for me. No problems with the tires wen dropping the air a tad. |
Originally Posted by zomby woof
(Post 475942)
...Millville sticky/front ...
|
I like Kenda 270's on my KLR650, I don't like it on the KLX250, for the same reasons ZW said. I prefer Trackmasters on the front.
I run Kenda 270's on the rear of either bike, but, I don't have mud or grass. The K270's are a bit squirrely at extreme lean angles on the road....the knobs/sidewall are just so flexible. But, OFF-road in the dry, aired down, they are almost as good as Trials tires. |
Originally Posted by Lutz
(Post 480805)
Is that a DOT tire?
FWIW, I've run those on my MX bike, the KLX, and now my vintage MX bike. I continue to be impressed by those tires. Since the price has gone up, there may be a better value out there now, I liked the K270 rear in just about every situation on the KLX. I preferred it to the TM II I'm running now. |
the k270 is a weird bird up front but can work pretty good. The 3.25 is wide and soft sidewall and acts diffent than the 3.00 which is thinner and stiffer sidewall. The key is getting the psi set where each works well. If you flat the 3.25 there no limping along, it's that soft when flatted. The 3.00 is alittle more conventional. I used to run the 3.25 front at low psi with a trials on back on my dirtbike and it worked amazing well in the wet roots and rocks, but for some reason the compound can be kind of slick aired up and leaned over on asphalt.
|
Guess I'm the only one that likes the K270 for all terrain ride. The only time I've had problems is when it came to mud. It would clog the knobies and turn the tire slick.
|
I'm gonna try the K270 rear and K760 tracmaster II front. Got the pair on my Amazon wish list for $118 no tax + free shipping.
|
I ran TrackMasters on my KLX... like 'em. The front is quite good. The rear tends to like to kick around if it gets loose, like on tiny rocks. It's almost done so I may try a TrackMaster II until the front is done, then replace both with something else. Considering Pirelli XCMH's or maybe even Michelin T63's. Dunno.
Rob |
tires tires tires
I have run
kenda 270 mitas stone eaters dunny 606 MT 21 perrelli so far favorite is mitas up front (90/90) and 606 rear (tho this MT 21 seems as good or better), prob is both these come in 120 size (abit tall). |
Originally Posted by zomby woof
(Post 480848)
Yes. I believe all Kenda MX fronts are DOT
MX Tires K780 SOUTHWICK II - Doesn't say K785 MILLVILLE II - Doesn't say K775 WASHOUGAL - Doesn't say K781 TRIPLE - Doesn't say K782 SAND MAD - Doesn't say K772 PARKER DT - DOT Approved K335 - DOT Approved Dual Sport Tires K760 TRAKMASTER II - DOT Approved K270 DUAL SPORT - DOT Approved K761 DUAL SPORT - DOT Approved K784 BIG BLOCK - DOT Approved I did find that a few online stores say that some of the MX tires are DOT. So I sent Kenda an email. Here is their response: Front MX tires are DOT approved. KENDA Powersports Division Gus Niewenhous Sales and Marketing Manager gniewenhous@kendausa.com 614.729.7878 7095 Americana Pkwy Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 I guess they don't list DOT approval on their website unless the front and rear are DOT approved. Thanks for the tip ZW! |
Just picked up a couple of MITAS tires (MEE-tas). Never tried them before, but they look sweet and the price is great!
The rubber compound feels good and I like the look of these lugs (aggressive). I won't be mounting them for another week or two, but I'll come back with a report. C-16 'StoneEater' DOT Rear 110/100-18 & C-21 'StoneKing' DOT Front 90/90-21 http://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-dc.../MITAS_C16.jpg http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-LW.../MITAS_C21.jpg |
Oh, and if anyone is considering the MITAS C-18 rear in 120 width, I don't recommend it. It looks SUPER wide - I measured the unmounted C-18 tire, and it was 5.7 inches at the lugs.
My Dunlop D606 (mounted) is only 4.7" wide at the lugs (120/90-18). I'm thinking 5.5 inches is the absolute max width of the rear tire for our bikes (measured at the lugs). The C-16 that I bought is 5.2" unmounted. |
Earlier this year I mounted a Kenda Trakmaster II on the rear and a Pirelli MT21 up front.
For offroad (maintaining DOT status) this combo works really well. Both tires look like they would wear rather quickly on a constant diet of pavement riding. The only other tires I've had on the KLX were the stock Dunlop 605s (didn't impress me offroad). |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:50 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands