![]() |
"Do not install KDX 200 snorkle"
Mike from Dynojet says that I should not install the KDX 200 snorkel. Any thoughts on that?
|
People have been running without lids for a long time. I don't see how a larger snorkel would be bad.
|
+1 Will try both ways since I already forked over $30 bucks...
|
Brien, I believe you are running a 124 main jet? How do you like it? What are some of the characteristics of how the bike handles with that set up? Mike from Dynojet thinks I need to back down the main jet size also.
|
I'm using a 128 main jet with my mods below. Other then some minor adjustments to the mixture screw I'm very pleased with the performance.
|
I have the 128 main in right now and I am not impressed with the take off. I want the front wheel to come off the ground a little bit better. The mid and high is where it shines. I want the power to feel like that from low, mid and high speeds. Thinking about dropping down to 124 main as suggested by Mike at Dynojet to see where I am at....
|
Originally Posted by Websurfing101
(Post 472133)
Mike from Dynojet says that I should not install the KDX 200 snorkle. Any thoughts on that?
|
I wish I had a dyno machine at the house. I could try all the combos to see what works best. Too much guess work.
|
i ran open box and no snorkel with the uni filter....but, after adding the k&n, i added the kdx snorkel...
|
It seems that the KDX snorkle would be about the same size as taking the stock snorkle out of the airbox. In theory, same size opening..............
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands