300 / 331 / 340 / 350 cc kits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2013 | 06:04 PM
  #81  
wildcard's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,414
From: Missouri
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by RockabillSlapMatt
Any one tried that 340 yet? Is it a good compromise? Hows the hp and torque numbers of the 331 vs 351? Most of the thread I find have had all the dyno chart pictures deleted I'm wondering if the 351 makes more torque and less horsepower, but the 340 (just maybe) might less torque and more horsepower? Or is the increase in CC on this bike directly proportional to more overall power
From most of the dyno charts i've seen over time it appears that all the kits make about the same total HP and torque (a little edge to the 351 on torque) but the larger displacement seems to move the torque and HP curve down lower on the RPM range. IE the 351 puts the power down sooner.


At a certain point beyond about 330cc it seems like the head design is what starts holding back unlocking more power (along with the stock cams). There are ways to address this but by that time you'll already have so much money into the bike its probably cheaper just to get a bigger bike.

I think the 340 is more or less a remnant of Bills development of the 351 kit, seeing how far he could push it. IIRC its still a "wet sleeve" and probably would have little gain over the 331 kit which is a "dry sleeve" and IMO the choice would be either 331 or 351 if you are looking at Bill's kit.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cpr1
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade Classifieds
21
Feb 9, 2013 08:15 AM
buffalony
KLX 250S
29
Oct 6, 2008 08:16 PM
2k1w=no$
KLX 250S
11
Oct 25, 2007 12:58 AM
KLX 250S
7
Mar 7, 2007 07:03 AM
bentou
General Tech
8
Dec 4, 2006 09:13 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 07:04 AM.