New Yorker cover
#2
RE: New Yorker cover
Sooo....whats everyone getting so worked up about?[>:]
Edit: Of course it's controversial, look at all of the attention the magazine is getting!
Edit: Of course it's controversial, look at all of the attention the magazine is getting!
#6
RE: New Yorker cover
I guess I fail to see what the big deal is...
Everyone knows that politicians always get this kind of stuff. Why should he be off-limits? Don't mess with the "golden boy" I guess...
Everyone knows that politicians always get this kind of stuff. Why should he be off-limits? Don't mess with the "golden boy" I guess...
#8
RE: New Yorker cover
exactly
ORIGINAL: zzrick
I guess I fail to see what the big deal is...
Everyone knows that politicians always get this kind of stuff. Why should he be off-limits? Don't mess with the "golden boy" I guess...
I guess I fail to see what the big deal is...
Everyone knows that politicians always get this kind of stuff. Why should he be off-limits? Don't mess with the "golden boy" I guess...
#9
RE: New Yorker cover
ORIGINAL: zzrick
I guess I fail to see what the big deal is...
Everyone knows that politicians always get this kind of stuff. Why should he be off-limits? Don't mess with the "golden boy" I guess...
I guess I fail to see what the big deal is...
Everyone knows that politicians always get this kind of stuff. Why should he be off-limits? Don't mess with the "golden boy" I guess...
#10
RE: New Yorker cover
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/1892
"In 2007, the National Journal said that Obama had established himself as “the most liberal Senator.” More liberal than Sanders? That is quite a feat. Does this make Obama a socialist, too? "
"In 2007, the National Journal said that Obama had established himself as “the most liberal Senator.” More liberal than Sanders? That is quite a feat. Does this make Obama a socialist, too? "