This chart is member tested and reported to be accurate.
https://www.jetsrus.com/FAQs/FAQ_mik...ihin_sizes.htm

KE DJ MIKUNI
92 92 85
95 94 87.5
98 96 90
100 98 92.5
102 100
105 102 95
108 104 97.5
110 106 100
112 108
115 110 102.5
118 112 105
120 114 107.5
122 116
125 118 110
128 120 112.5
130 122 115
132 124
135 126 117.5
138 128 120
140 130 122.5
142 132
145 134 125
148 136 127.5
150 138 130
152 140
155 142 132.5
158 144 135
160 146 137.5
162 148
165 150 140
168 152 142.5
170 154 145
172 156
175 158 147.5
178 160 150
180 162 152.5
182 164
185 166 155
188 168 157.5
190 170 160
192 172
195 174 162.5
198 176 165
200 178 167.5
202 180
205 182 170
208 184 172.5
210 186 175
212 188
215 190 177.5
218 192 180
220 194 182.5
222 196
225 198 185
228 200 187.5

 

I'd love to perform a little test with some vinyl tubing, a K138 vs a DJ130, and a measured amount of gasoline.

A timed test to see how close they were at draining a 1/2 cup of gasoline into a container. I have a hard time believing the DJ130 will be faster then the Keihin. The hole in the K is that much larger.

 

Yep, I know. DJ told me years ago that all online jet x-over charts are based on hole size, which means that none of them are accurate with DJ jets. DJ jets have a sophisticated venturi cross section that performs quite differently, under vacuum, from holes drilled in brass..

This chart/site recognizes this issue with DJ jets and has apparently somehow managed to find x-overs that perform similar - Also note that the K jets are much larger for a given DJ jet than they are on charts based on "hole size"..

 

Makes sense that a square edged hole would pass less fuel than one with smoothed entrance and exit for a given hole size.